Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1165 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):230-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01274.x.
In the absence of a biological marker and expert consensus on the best approach to classify chronic migraine (CM), recent revised criteria for this disease has been proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. This revised criteria for CM is now presented in the Appendix. Herein we field test the revised criteria for CM. We included individuals with transformed migraine with or without medication overuse (TM+ and TM–), according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein and Lipton, since this criterion has been largely used before the Second Edition of the International Classification of the Headache Disorders (ICHD-2). We assessed the proportion of subjects that fulfilled ICHD-2 criteria for CM or probable chronic migraine with probable medication overuse (CM+), as well as the revised ICHD-2 (ICHD-2R) criteria for CM (15 days of headache, 8 days of migraine or migraine-specific acute medication use—ergotamine or triptans). We also tested the ICHD-2R vs. three proposals. In proposal 1, CM/CM+ would require at least 15 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Proposal 2 required 15 days of headache per month and at least 50% of these days were migraine or probable migraine. Proposal 3 required 15 days of headache and at least 8 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Of the 158 patients with TM–, just 5.6% met ICHD-2 criteria for CM. According to the ICHD-2R, a total of 92.4% met criteria for CM (P < 0.001 vs. ICHD-2). The ICHD-2R criterion performed better than proposal 1 (47.8% of agreement, P < 0.01) and was not statistically different from proposals 2 (87.9%) and 3 (94.9%). Subjects with TM+ should be classified as medication overuse headache (MOH), and not CM+, according to the ICHD-2R. Nonetheless, we assessed the proportion of them who had 8 days of migraine per month. Of the 399 individuals with TM+, just 10.2% could be classified as CM+ in the ICHD-2. However, most (349, 86.9%) had 8 days of migraine per month and could be classified as MOH and probable CM in the ICHD-2R(P < 0.001 vs. ICHD-2). We conclude that the ICHD-2R addresses most of the criticism towards the ICHD-2 and should be adopted in clinical practice and research. In the population where use of specific acute migraine medications is less common, the agreement between ICHD-2R CM and TM may be less robust.
在缺乏生物学标志物和专家共识的情况下,国际头痛协会头痛分类委员会最近提出了慢性偏头痛(CM)的最佳分类方法。该修订标准现附录于后文。在此,我们对 CM 的修订标准进行了现场测试。我们纳入了符合 Silberstein 和 Lipton 提出的转化性偏头痛伴或不伴药物过度使用(TM+和 TM–)标准的个体,因为该标准在第二版国际头痛疾病分类(ICHD-2)之前已被广泛应用。我们评估了符合 ICHD-2 标准的 CM 或可能的慢性偏头痛伴可能的药物过度使用(CM+)的患者比例,以及 ICHD-2 的修订标准(ICHD-2R)(头痛 15 天,偏头痛或偏头痛特异性急性药物使用 8 天——麦角胺或曲坦类药物)。我们还测试了 ICHD-2R 与三种建议的标准的比较。在建议 1 中,CM/CM+需要每月至少 15 天的偏头痛或可能的偏头痛。建议 2 要求每月头痛 15 天,其中至少 50%的天数为偏头痛或可能的偏头痛。建议 3 要求每月头痛 15 天,并且每月至少有 8 天的偏头痛或可能的偏头痛。在 158 名 TM–患者中,仅有 5.6%符合 ICHD-2 标准的 CM。根据 ICHD-2R,共有 92.4%符合 CM 标准(P<0.001 与 ICHD-2 相比)。ICHD-2R 标准的性能优于建议 1(47.8%的一致性,P<0.01),与建议 2(87.9%)和建议 3(94.9%)无统计学差异。根据 ICHD-2R,TM+患者应被归类为药物过度使用性头痛(MOH),而不是 CM+。尽管如此,我们评估了他们中每月有 8 天偏头痛的比例。在 399 名 TM+患者中,仅有 10.2%的患者可根据 ICHD-2 被归类为 CM+。然而,大多数(349,86.9%)每月有 8 天偏头痛,可根据 ICHD-2R 被归类为 MOH 和可能的 CM(P<0.001 与 ICHD-2 相比)。我们的结论是,ICHD-2R 解决了对 ICHD-2 的大多数批评意见,应在临床实践和研究中采用。在使用特定的急性偏头痛药物不太常见的人群中,ICHD-2R CM 和 TM 之间的一致性可能不那么可靠。