Jani Ashesh B, Shoushtari Asal, Feinstein Jeffrey M
Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26(12):723-31. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200626120-00006.
Androgen ablation is often used in addition to low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer, particularly for disease with adverse features. We report a single-institution experience and analysis of the role of androgen ablation with brachytherapy in patients with prostate cancer.
A cohort of 189 consecutive patients receiving low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer at our institution who had demographic, disease and treatment information and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up available, constituted the analysis study group. This cohort was divided into two major categories based on the use of androgen ablation. Using two successive prostate- specific antigen (PSA) rises above 1 ng/mL as the definition of failure, biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) curves were constructed for the androgen ablation and no-androgen ablation groups and compared using the log rank test; additionally, a multivariate analysis of all major disease and treatment factors was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. These analyses were conducted for the whole cohort as well as for subgroups defined by the use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
The 4-year BFFS in the androgen ablation versus no-androgen ablation groups was 76% versus 70% (p = 0.230) for the whole cohort, 75% versus 62% (p = 0.182) for EBRT patients, and 75% versus 82% (p = 0.764) for no-EBRT patients. For the whole cohort, the use of EBRT was the only factor reaching significance on multivariate analysis (p = 0.040). When analysing the EBRT and no-EBRT subgroups separately, no factor, including androgen ablation, reached significance on multivariate analysis.
In our study, addition of androgen ablation conferred no biochemical control advantage when added to low-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.
雄激素去除疗法常与低剂量率近距离放射疗法联合用于前列腺癌的治疗,尤其是针对具有不良特征的疾病。我们报告了在单一机构中对雄激素去除疗法联合近距离放射疗法在前列腺癌患者中的作用的经验及分析。
在我们机构,一组连续189例接受前列腺癌低剂量率近距离放射疗法的患者构成了分析研究组,这些患者有人口统计学、疾病和治疗信息,且至少有2年的随访数据。根据是否使用雄激素去除疗法,该队列分为两大类。以连续两次前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高超过1 ng/mL作为失败的定义,构建雄激素去除疗法组和非雄激素去除疗法组的无生化失败生存期(BFFS)曲线,并使用对数秩检验进行比较;此外,使用Cox比例风险模型对所有主要疾病和治疗因素进行多变量分析。这些分析针对整个队列以及根据是否使用外照射放疗(EBRT)定义的亚组进行。
整个队列中,雄激素去除疗法组与非雄激素去除疗法组的4年BFFS分别为76%和70%(p = 0.230);EBRT患者中,分别为75%和62%(p = 0.182);非EBRT患者中,分别为75%和8- 2%(p = 0.764)。对于整个队列,多变量分析中,使用EBRT是唯一具有显著意义的因素(p = 0.040)。分别分析EBRT和非EBRT亚组时,包括雄激素去除疗法在内的任何因素在多变量分析中均无显著意义。
在我们的研究中,对于前列腺癌患者,在低剂量率近距离放射疗法基础上加用雄激素去除疗法在生化控制方面无优势。