Asset tracking systems are used in healthcare to find objects--medical devices and other hospital equipment--and to record the physical location of those objects over time. Interest in asset tracking is growing daily, but the technology is still evolving, and so far very few systems have been implemented in hospitals. This situation is likely to change over the next few years, at which point many hospitals will be faced with choosing a system. We evaluated four asset tracking systems from four suppliers: Agility Healthcare Solutions, Ekahau, Radianse, and Versus Technology. We judged the systems' performance for two "levels" of asset tracking. The first level is basic locating--simply determining where in the facility an item can be found. This may be done because the equipment needs routine inspection and preventive maintenance or because it is required for recall purposes; or the equipment may be needed, often urgently, for clinical use. The second level, which is much more involved, is inventory optimization and workflow improvement. This entails analyzing asset utilization based on historical location data to improve the use, distribution, and processing of equipment. None of the evaluated products is ideal for all uses--each has strengths and weaknesses. In many cases, hospitals will have to select a product based on their specific needs. For example, they may need to choose between a supplier whose system is easy to install and a supplier whose tags have a long battery operating life.
资产追踪系统在医疗保健领域用于查找物品——医疗设备及其他医院设施,并记录这些物品随时间推移的实际位置。对资产追踪的兴趣与日俱增,但该技术仍在不断发展,到目前为止,医院中实施的系统非常少。这种情况在未来几年可能会改变,届时许多医院将面临选择系统的问题。我们评估了来自四家供应商的四个资产追踪系统:敏捷医疗保健解决方案公司(Agility Healthcare Solutions)、艾卡浩公司(Ekahau)、拉迪安斯公司(Radianse)和维瑟斯技术公司(Versus Technology)。我们从资产追踪的两个“层面”评判了这些系统的性能。第一个层面是基本定位——仅仅确定在设施中的何处可以找到某项物品。这样做可能是因为设备需要例行检查和预防性维护,或者是出于召回目的;或者该设备可能常常急需用于临床。第二个层面则复杂得多,是库存优化和工作流程改进。这需要基于历史位置数据来分析资产利用情况,以改善设备的使用、分配和处理。所评估的产品没有一个对所有用途来说都是理想的——每个产品都有优缺点。在许多情况下,医院将不得不根据自身的特定需求选择产品。例如,他们可能需要在系统易于安装的供应商和标签电池续航时间长的供应商之间做出选择。