Inoue Tatsuo, Kitano Masayuki, Kudo Masatoshi, Sakamoto Hiroki, Kawasaki Toshihiko, Yasuda Chikao, Maekawa Kiyoshi
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Mar;33(3):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.09.003.
We evaluated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(US) for detecting and differentiating gallbladder lesions. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic US was performed on 90 patients with gallbladder abnormalities. After administering Levovist, we observed the gallbladders in real time. Contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic ultrasonography was compared with B-mode US and contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) with regard to the sensitivity and specificity in depicting the elevated gallbladder lesions. Furthermore, we assessed how the vascular patterns of the elevated gallbladder lesions depicted by contrast-enhanced US correlated with the diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced US efficiently discriminated true lesions from biliary sludge, unlike B-mode US. Consequently, contrast-enhanced US was more specific (100%) than B-mode US (81%), although their sensitivities were similar (98% and 96%, respectively). Contrast-enhanced US was also more sensitive that contrast-enhanced CT (98% versus 79%), although the two methods were equally sensitive (100% versus 95%). We classified the vascular patterns of the abnormalities depicted by contrast-enhanced US in the 90 cases into types 1 to 4, which represent branch-like, heterogeneous, homogeneous, and avascular patterns, respectively. All type 1 and 2 lesions were over 10 mm in size while most (88%) type 3 lesions were 10 mm or less in size. While the majority of carcinomas (86%) were type 1 or 2, three benign lesions also showed these patterns. Thus, the vascular pattern may simply reflect the size of the lesion and therefore its usefulness in diagnosing gallbladder lesions may be limited. Nevertheless, contrast-enhanced US is clearly superior to the other techniques in discriminating biliary sludge from other lesions.
我们评估了超声造影(US)在检测和鉴别胆囊病变方面的实用性。对90例胆囊异常患者进行了超声造影编码相位反转谐波检查。给予声诺维后,我们实时观察胆囊。在描绘胆囊隆起性病变的敏感性和特异性方面,将超声造影编码相位反转谐波超声与B型超声和增强计算机断层扫描(CT)进行了比较。此外,我们评估了超声造影所描绘的胆囊隆起性病变的血管模式与诊断之间的相关性。与B型超声不同,超声造影能有效地区分真正的病变与胆泥。因此,超声造影的特异性(100%)高于B型超声(81%),尽管它们的敏感性相似(分别为98%和96%)。超声造影的敏感性也高于增强CT(98%对79%),尽管两种方法的特异性相当(100%对95%)。我们将90例超声造影所描绘的异常血管模式分为1至4型,分别代表分支状、不均匀、均匀和无血管模式。所有1型和2型病变大小超过10 mm,而大多数(88%)3型病变大小为10 mm或更小。虽然大多数癌(86%)为1型或2型,但也有三个良性病变表现出这些模式。因此,血管模式可能仅仅反映了病变的大小,因此其在诊断胆囊病变中的实用性可能有限。然而,在区分胆泥与其他病变方面,超声造影明显优于其他技术。