Suppr超能文献

利物浦不良事件概况:与抗癫痫药物使用及情绪的关系

The Liverpool Adverse Events Profile: relation to AED use and mood.

作者信息

Panelli Rosemary June, Kilpatrick Christine, Moore Susan M, Matkovic Zelko, D'Souza Wendyl J, O'Brien Terence J

机构信息

Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Camberwell, Australia.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2007 Mar;48(3):456-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00956.x. Epub 2007 Feb 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) is used as a systematic measure of adverse effects from antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study evaluated LAEP in newly diagnosed seizure patients, and examined the relation between LAEP, anxiety, and depression.

METHODS

Seizure patients seen in the two First Seizure Clinics were categorized into group A (AEDs commenced after assessment), group B (AEDs commenced before assessment), and group C (no AEDs). LAEP and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were completed at baseline (n=164) and 3 months (n=103). Each LAEP symptom was assessed for baseline frequency, 3-month frequency, and frequency change over a 3-month period. Global scores for LAEP and HADS were analysed at baseline and 3 months.

RESULTS

Symptom-reporting patterns were similar between groups. However, increased frequency over a 3-month period occurred for 12 symptoms in group A, 10 in group B, and one in group C. Global LAEP and HADS showed no significant group differences at baseline or changes over a 3-month period. Multiple regression revealed that HADS scores predicted LAEP global scores better than did AED status. Multivariate analyses of variance demonstrated that increased reporting of 16 of 19 LAEP symptoms was significantly related to higher anxiety and depression rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In a First Seizure Clinic, LAEP detects changes in specific symptom frequencies when used as a repeated, symptom-by-symptom measure. Increased symptom frequency is associated with diagnostic category/AED treatment, anxiety, and depression. Global LAEP scores do not illustrate differences in symptom reporting between patients.

摘要

目的

利物浦不良事件概况(LAEP)用作抗癫痫药物(AED)不良反应的系统测量方法。本研究评估了新诊断癫痫患者的LAEP,并研究了LAEP与焦虑和抑郁之间的关系。

方法

在两家首次癫痫诊所就诊的癫痫患者被分为A组(评估后开始使用AED)、B组(评估前开始使用AED)和C组(未使用AED)。在基线时(n = 164)和3个月时(n = 103)完成LAEP和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。对每个LAEP症状的基线频率、3个月频率以及3个月期间的频率变化进行评估。在基线和3个月时分析LAEP和HADS的总体得分。

结果

各组之间的症状报告模式相似。然而,A组有12种症状在3个月期间频率增加,B组有10种,C组有1种。LAEP和HADS的总体得分在基线时无显著组间差异,在3个月期间也无变化。多元回归显示,HADS得分比AED状态能更好地预测LAEP总体得分。多变量方差分析表明,19种LAEP症状中有16种报告增加与更高的焦虑和抑郁发生率显著相关。

结论

在首次癫痫诊所中,LAEP用作重复的逐个症状测量时可检测特定症状频率的变化。症状频率增加与诊断类别/AED治疗、焦虑和抑郁相关。LAEP总体得分未显示患者之间症状报告的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验