Lise-Schneider B, Calvas P, Roche O, Lambert J C, Dufier J L, Costet-Fighiera C
Service d'Ophtalmologie, CHU de Nice, Hôpital Saint Roch, Nice, France.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Jan;30(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(07)89549-0.
Congenital glaucoma associated with aniridia and primary congenital glaucoma are regarded as different entities. Indeed, the abnormalities of the angle's structures as well as the genes involved are different. We report the observation of two sisters presenting these two types of glaucoma with particular attention paid to the importance and the difficulty of genetic counseling.
Child L, with no particular family history, had presented bilateral aniridia complicated by bilateral glaucoma since birth. In addition to medical and surgical treatment, general and genetic investigations were undertaken that revealed no abnormalities. No microdeletion of the gene PAX6 responsible for the aniridia was found. Consequently, the genetic advice was in favor of a second pregnancy for this couple. At birth, L's sister also presented bilateral congenital glaucoma, which was isolated, without aniridia. New genetic investigations were carried out but no abnormalities in PAX6, nor in FOXC1 or PITX2 involved in the development of the anterior chamber, were found. Moreover, the haplotypes for aniridia locus AN2 inherited by the two sisters were different, proof that this gene could not be responsible for the glaucoma.
At L's birth, the hypothesis retained was that she was a sporadic case whose gene mutation could not be identified (which happens in 50% of sporadic cases). The risk for the second pregnancy was negligible, although not null. The primary congenital glaucoma presented by L's sister remains unexplained in the context of aniridia and the role of the PAX6 gene was eliminated. The study of PITX2 and FOXC1 genes involved in anterior segment dysgenesis proved that they were also not involved. Thus, this observation evokes the responsibility of a gene other than PAX6 in aniridia, which could also have a role in isolated congenital glaucoma.
Analysis of congenital pathologies from a more genetic than clinical point of view seems to progressively break down the barriers established between the various phenotypes of hereditary congenital anomalies. Even if the association of aniridia and primary congenital glaucoma in siblings is reported here for the first time, it does not appear so extraordinary if one considers the complexity of the anterior chamber's development, which involves many genes, most of them still unidentified to date.
与无虹膜相关的先天性青光眼和原发性先天性青光眼被视为不同的疾病实体。实际上,房角结构的异常以及所涉及的基因均有所不同。我们报告了对两名患有这两种类型青光眼的姐妹的观察情况,并特别关注了遗传咨询的重要性和困难程度。
儿童L无特殊家族病史,自出生起就患有双侧无虹膜并伴有双侧青光眼。除了进行药物和手术治疗外,还开展了全面的检查和基因检测,但未发现异常。未检测到负责无虹膜的PAX6基因的微缺失。因此,遗传咨询建议这对夫妇可以再次怀孕。L的妹妹出生时也患有双侧先天性青光眼,但为单纯性,无无虹膜症状。再次进行了基因检测,结果显示PAX6基因、参与前房发育的FOXC1基因或PITX2基因均无异常。此外,两姐妹所遗传的无虹膜位点AN2的单倍型不同,这证明该基因并非导致青光眼的原因。
L出生时,最初的假设是她为散发病例,其基因突变无法确定(在50%的散发病例中会出现这种情况)。再次怀孕的风险可忽略不计,尽管并非完全没有。L的妹妹所患的原发性先天性青光眼在无虹膜的情况下仍无法解释,并且已排除PAX6基因的作用。对参与眼前节发育异常的PITX2和FOXC1基因的研究表明它们也与该病无关。因此,该观察结果提示在无虹膜中存在一个不同于PAX6的基因,它可能在单纯性先天性青光眼中也发挥作用。
从遗传学而非临床角度分析先天性疾病似乎正在逐渐打破遗传性先天性异常的各种表型之间所建立的障碍。即使本文首次报道了兄弟姐妹中无虹膜与原发性先天性青光眼的关联,但考虑到前房发育的复杂性,其中涉及许多基因,而大多数基因至今仍未明确,这种情况似乎也并不罕见。