Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜结肠切除术中电热双极血管闭合装置与超声凝固剪的比较研究

Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.

作者信息

Campagnacci Roberto, de Sanctis Angelo, Baldarelli Maddalena, Rimini Massimiliano, Lezoche Giovanni, Guerrieri Mario

机构信息

Clinica di Chirurgia Generale e Metodologia Chirurgica, Ospedali Riuniti, University of Ancona, via Conca 1, 60121, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1526-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9143-2. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many devices are available for vascular control during laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS), vascular staplers, titanium or plastic clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) are currently used according to the surgeon's preference. This study aimed to compare EBVS Ligasure with UCS.

METHODS

We report the outcome of 200 consecutive unselected patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections of which 100 were performed with EBVS Ligasure (from September 2004 to December 2005, group 1) and 100 with UCS harmonic scalpel (from December 2002 to June 2004, group 2). Only the following three types of operation were performed: right colectomy (RC), left colectomy (LC), and low anterior resections (LAR). Emergency procedures have been excluded. The same attending surgical teams performed or supervised all procedures. Operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospital stay were investigated.

RESULTS

Age, gender, previous surgical abdominal procedures, and ASA risk were similar between the two groups, as well as was the percentage of malignant cases (74% vs. 71%, respectively). There were 32 vs. 37 RC, 50 vs. 47 LC, and 18 vs. 16 LAR in groups 1 and 2, respectively. There was no mortality in either group. A conversion to open surgery and two major complications occurred in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences in mean operating time (111 vs. 133, 140 vs. 176, and 153 vs. 201 min) and in the mean postoperative hospital stay (5.2 vs. 6.1, 6.5 vs. 7.1, and 6.8 vs 7.3 days) for RC, LC, and LAR between group 1 and 2, respectively. We do report interesting data about statistically significant differences in the blood loss: 115 vs. 370, 150 vs. 455, and 185 vs. 495 ml for RC (p < 0.001), LC (p < 0.001), and LAR (p = 0.002) between group 1 and group 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our laparoscopic colorectal experience, EBVS Ligasure has proven safe and effective in vessel sealing. Patients in whom this device was used had less blood loss and slight advantages in operating time and postoperative hospital stay.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜结直肠手术中,有多种器械可用于血管控制。目前,超声刀(UCS)、血管吻合器、钛夹或塑料夹以及双极电凝血管闭合系统(EBVS)可根据外科医生的偏好使用。本研究旨在比较EBVS Ligasure与UCS。

方法

我们报告了200例连续接受腹腔镜结直肠切除术的未选择患者的结果,其中100例使用EBVS Ligasure进行手术(2004年9月至2005年12月,第1组),100例使用UCS超声刀进行手术(2002年12月至2004年6月,第2组)。仅进行了以下三种类型的手术:右半结肠切除术(RC)、左半结肠切除术(LC)和低位前切除术(LAR)。急诊手术被排除在外。所有手术均由同一主治手术团队进行或监督。对手术时间、失血量、并发症和术后住院时间进行了调查。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、既往腹部手术史和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)风险相似,恶性病例的百分比也相似(分别为74%和71%)。第1组和第2组分别有32例和37例RC、50例和47例LC以及18例和16例LAR。两组均无死亡病例。第2组有1例转为开腹手术和2例严重并发症。第1组和第2组在RC、LC和LAR的平均手术时间(分别为111对133、140对176和153对201分钟)和平均术后住院时间(分别为5.2对6.1、6.5对7.1和6.8对7.3天)方面无统计学显著差异。我们确实报告了关于失血量有统计学显著差异的有趣数据:第1组和第2组在RC(115对370毫升,p < 0.001)、LC(150对455毫升,p < 0.001)和LAR(185对495毫升,p = 0.002)中的失血量分别为上述数据。

结论

在我们的腹腔镜结直肠手术经验中,EBVS Ligasure已被证明在血管闭合方面安全有效。使用该器械的患者失血量更少,在手术时间和术后住院时间方面略有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验