Hamade A M, Issa M E, Haylett K R, Ammori B J
Department of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):965-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9142-3. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
Dislodgement of ports from the abdominal wall is a common problem during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate port stability using either cutting or blunt-tipped trocars.
Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomized to have the secondary ports inserted using either cutting or blunt-tipped trocars. The fixity of ports to the abdominal wall was evaluated at the start and completion of surgery by measuring the total traction force required to displace the ports. Similarly, the friction forces required to displace instruments within the ports were measured.
Thirty patients were randomized into two groups (15 patients in each group), and a total of 114 ports (cutting, n = 51; blunt, n = 63) were evaluated. The groups were comparable in age, gender, body mass index, and operating time. The total traction forces needed to displace the 5-mm and 10-mm ports were significantly lower when cutting trocars were used at both the beginning (2.6 vs. 11.8 N, p < 0.001, and 6.3 vs. 15.5 N, p = 0.014, respectively) and completion of surgery (1.3 vs. 6.7 N, p < 0.001, and 1.1 vs. 12.0 N, p = 0.001, respectively). The declines in the total traction forces from the start to the completion of surgery were significant for the 5-mm and 10-mm cutting-trocar ports (p = 0.031 and p = 0.043, respectively) but not for the blunt-trocar ports (p = 0.088 and p = 0.152, respectively). While no significant differences between the instruments' friction forces and the traction forces of the cutting-trocar ports were observed, the former were significantly lower than the traction force needed to displace the blunt-trocar ports. This explains the significantly greater frequency of spontaneous port dislodgements when cutting ports were employed (25.5% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). Port-site bleeding was encountered only in patients (n = 2, 13%) where cutting trocars were used.
Port fixity to the abdominal wall during laparoscopic surgery declines with time. The insertion of ports using a blunt-tipped trocar is associated with significantly greater stability and fixity of the port to the abdominal wall. The use of blunt-tipped trocars is recommended for routine practice in laparoscopic surgery.
在腹腔镜手术期间,端口从腹壁脱出是一个常见问题。本研究的目的是使用切割型或钝头套管针评估端口稳定性。
接受腹腔镜手术的患者被随机分为两组,分别使用切割型或钝头套管针插入辅助端口。在手术开始时和结束时,通过测量使端口移位所需的总牵引力来评估端口与腹壁的固定性。同样,测量使器械在端口内移位所需的摩擦力。
30例患者被随机分为两组(每组15例),共评估了114个端口(切割型,n = 51;钝头型,n = 63)。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数和手术时间方面具有可比性。在手术开始时(分别为2.6对11.8 N,p < 0.001,以及6.3对15.5 N,p = 0.014)和结束时(分别为1.3对6.7 N,p < 0.001,以及1.1对12.0 N,p = 0.001),使用切割型套管针时,使5毫米和10毫米端口移位所需的总牵引力显著更低。对于5毫米和10毫米切割型套管针端口,从手术开始到结束时总牵引力的下降具有显著性(分别为p = 0.031和p = 0.043),而对于钝头套管针端口则无显著性(分别为p = 0.088和p = 0.152)。虽然未观察到器械摩擦力与切割型套管针端口牵引力之间存在显著差异,但前者显著低于使钝头套管针端口移位所需的牵引力。这解释了使用切割型端口时自发端口脱出的频率显著更高(25.5%对1.6%,p < 0.001)。仅在使用切割型套管针的患者(n = 2,13%)中出现了端口部位出血。
腹腔镜手术期间端口与腹壁的固定性随时间下降。使用钝头套管针插入端口与端口对腹壁具有显著更高的稳定性和固定性相关。建议在腹腔镜手术的常规操作中使用钝头套管针。