Suppr超能文献

基于残疾风险因素模式的急性工作相关性背痛患者聚类分析

Patient clusters in acute, work-related back pain based on patterns of disability risk factors.

作者信息

Shaw William S, Pransky Glenn, Patterson William, Linton Steven J, Winters Thomas

机构信息

Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Center for Disability Research, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Feb;49(2):185-93. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000254205.47334.c3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify subgroups of patients with work-related back pain based on disability risk factors.

METHODS

Patients with work-related back pain (N = 528) completed a 16-item questionnaire of potential disability risk factors before their initial medical evaluation. Outcomes of pain, functional limitation, and work disability were assessed 1 and 3 months later.

RESULTS

A K-Means cluster analysis of 5 disability risk factors (pain, depressed mood, fear avoidant beliefs, work inflexibility, and poor expectations for recovery) resulted in 4 sub-groups: low risk (n = 182); emotional distress (n = 103); severe pain/fear avoidant (n = 102); and concerns about job accommodation (n = 141). Pain and disability outcomes at follow-up were superior in the low-risk group and poorest in the severe pain/fear avoidant group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute back pain can be discriminated into subgroups depending on whether disability is related to pain beliefs, emotional distress, or workplace concerns.

摘要

目的

基于残疾风险因素确定与工作相关的背痛患者亚组。

方法

与工作相关的背痛患者(N = 528)在首次医学评估前完成了一份包含16项潜在残疾风险因素的问卷。在1个月和3个月后评估疼痛、功能受限和工作残疾的结果。

结果

对5个残疾风险因素(疼痛、情绪低落、恐惧回避信念、工作灵活性差和对恢复的期望低)进行K均值聚类分析,得出4个亚组:低风险组(n = 182);情绪困扰组(n = 103);严重疼痛/恐惧回避组(n = 102);以及对工作调整的担忧组(n = 141)。随访时的疼痛和残疾结果在低风险组中最佳,在严重疼痛/恐惧回避组中最差。

结论

急性背痛患者可根据残疾是否与疼痛信念、情绪困扰或工作场所担忧相关分为不同亚组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验