Lee Grace M, Murphy Trudy V, Lett Susan, Cortese Margaret M, Kretsinger Katrina, Schauer Stephanie, Lieu Tracy A
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Mar;32(3):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.10.016.
Prior economic analyses have reached disparate conclusions about whether vaccinating adults against pertussis would be cost effective. Newly available data on pertussis incidence were used to evaluate the cost effectiveness of one-time adult vaccination and adult vaccination with decennial boosters.
A Markov model was used to calculate the health benefits, risks, costs, and cost effectiveness of the following strategies: (1) no adult pertussis vaccination, (2) one-time adult vaccination at 20-64 years, and (3) adult vaccination with decennial boosters. The impact of the severity of pertussis illness, vaccine adverse events, and herd immunity on model outcomes were also examined.
At a disease incidence of 360 per 100,000, the one-time adult vaccination strategy would prevent 2.8 million cases, and the decennial vaccination strategy would prevent 8.3 million cases. As disease incidence varied from 10 to 500 per 100,000, the one-time adult vaccination strategy was projected to prevent 79,000 to 3.8 million adult pertussis cases, while the decennial vaccination program would prevent 239,000 to 11.4 million cases. A one-time adult vaccination strategy would result in 106 million people vaccinated, or approximately 64% of the adult cohort, for a total program cost of $2.1 billion, while a decennial vaccination strategy would cost $6.7 billion. The one-time and decennial booster vaccination strategies result in cost-effectiveness ratios of <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year saved if disease incidence in adults were greater than 120 cases per 100,000 population.
Routine vaccination of adults aged 20 to 64 years with combined tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis is cost effective if pertussis incidence in this age group is greater than 120 per 100,000 population.
先前的经济分析对于成人接种百日咳疫苗是否具有成本效益得出了不同结论。利用新获得的百日咳发病率数据来评估一次性成人疫苗接种和每十年加强一次的成人疫苗接种的成本效益。
采用马尔可夫模型计算以下策略的健康效益、风险、成本和成本效益:(1)不进行成人百日咳疫苗接种;(2)20至64岁时进行一次性成人疫苗接种;(3)每十年加强一次的成人疫苗接种。还研究了百日咳疾病严重程度、疫苗不良事件和群体免疫对模型结果的影响。
在每10万人中有360例疾病发病率的情况下,一次性成人疫苗接种策略可预防280万例病例,每十年接种一次的策略可预防830万例病例。随着疾病发病率从每10万人10例变化到500例,一次性成人疫苗接种策略预计可预防7.9万至380万例成人百日咳病例,而每十年接种一次的计划可预防23.9万至1140万例病例。一次性成人疫苗接种策略将使1.06亿人接种疫苗,约占成人队列的64%,总计划成本为21亿美元,而每十年接种一次的策略成本为67亿美元。如果成人疾病发病率高于每10万人口120例,一次性和每十年加强一次的疫苗接种策略的成本效益比均低于每获得一个质量调整生命年节省50,000美元。
如果该年龄组的百日咳发病率高于每10万人口120例,对20至64岁的成年人常规接种破伤风类毒素、白喉类毒素和无细胞百日咳联合疫苗具有成本效益。