Suppr超能文献

非穿透性青光眼手术:一项批判性评估。

Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery: a critical evaluation.

作者信息

Sarodia Usman, Shaarawy Tarek, Barton Keith

机构信息

Glaucoma Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;18(2):152-8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328091c1ae.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery is popular in a number of countries because of its perceived superior safety profile to mitomycin-C trabeculectomy. This article critically evaluates recently published literature relating to nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent modifications in nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery, including the use of implants, augmentation with antiproliferatives, and use of laser goniopuncture, appear to result in improved intraocular pressure control. Comparative studies suggest a better safety profile with nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery but higher long-term intraocular pressure than after trabeculectomy. Despite this perception, a difference in intraocular pressure control between mitomycin-C trabeculectomy and nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery, when the most recent modification has been incorporated, has not been demonstrated conclusively in randomized trials conducted over sufficiently long periods to be clinically important.

SUMMARY

Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery continues to evolve. Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy seems to have improved with recent modifications in technique but the degree and longevity of intraocular pressure-lowering in comparison with trabeculectomy are still uncertain.

摘要

综述目的

非穿透性青光眼手术在许多国家都很受欢迎,因为人们认为它比丝裂霉素C小梁切除术具有更高的安全性。本文对最近发表的有关非穿透性青光眼手术的文献进行了批判性评价。

最新发现

非穿透性青光眼手术的近期改良,包括植入物的使用、抗增殖药物增强以及激光房角穿刺的应用,似乎能改善眼压控制。比较研究表明,非穿透性青光眼手术具有更好的安全性,但与小梁切除术后相比,长期眼压更高。尽管有这种看法,但在进行了足够长时间且具有临床重要性的随机试验中,尚未最终证明在采用最新改良技术后,丝裂霉素C小梁切除术和非穿透性青光眼手术在眼压控制方面存在差异。

总结

非穿透性青光眼手术仍在不断发展。随着技术的近期改良,眼压降低效果似乎有所改善,但与小梁切除术相比,眼压降低的程度和持久性仍不确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验