Mittelmark Maurice B, Wise Marilyn, Nam Eun Woo, Santos-Burgoa Carlos, Fosse Elisabeth, Saan Hans, Hagard Spencer, Tang Kwok Cho
Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Bergen, Christiesgt. 13, N-5015 Bergen, Norway.
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21 Suppl 1:91-8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal056.
This paper reviews approaches to the mapping of resources needed to engage in health promotion at the country level. There is not a single way, or a best way to make a capacity map, since it should speak to the needs of its users as they define their needs. Health promotion capacity mapping is therefore approached in various ways. At the national level, the objective is usually to learn the extent to which essential policies, institutions, programmes and practices are in place to guide recommendations about what remedial measures are desirable. In Europe, capacity mapping has been undertaken at the national level by the WHO for a decade. A complimentary capacity mapping approach, HP-Source.net, has been undertaken since 2000 by a consortium of European organizations including the EC, WHO, International Union for Health Promotion and Education, Health Development Agency (of England) and various European university research centres. The European approach emphasizes the need for multi-methods and the principle of triangulation. In North America, Canadian approaches have included large- and small-scale international collaborations to map capacity for sustainable development. US efforts include state-level mapping of capacity to prevent chronic diseases and reduce risk factor levels. In Australia, two decades of mapping national health promotion capacity began with systems needed by the health sector to design and deliver effective, efficient health promotion, and has now expanded to include community-level capacity and policy review. In Korea and Japan, capacity mapping is newly developing in collaboration with European efforts, illustrating the usefulness of international health promotion networks. Mapping capacity for health promotion is a practical and vital aspect of developing capacity for health promotion. The new context for health promotion contains both old and new challenges, but also new opportunities. A large scale, highly collaborative approach to capacity mapping is possible today due to developments in communication technology and the spread of international networks of health promoters. However, in capacity mapping, local variation will always be important, to fit variation in local contexts.
本文回顾了在国家层面绘制健康促进所需资源图谱的方法。绘制能力图谱没有单一的方法,也没有最佳方法,因为它应该满足用户在界定自身需求时的需要。因此,健康促进能力图谱有多种绘制方式。在国家层面,目标通常是了解基本政策、机构、项目和实践在何种程度上到位,以指导关于哪些补救措施是可取的建议。在欧洲,世界卫生组织在国家层面开展能力图谱绘制工作已有十年。自2000年以来,包括欧盟委员会、世界卫生组织、国际健康促进与教育联盟、(英格兰)健康发展局以及欧洲各大学研究中心在内的欧洲组织联盟采用了一种互补的能力图谱绘制方法,即HP - Source.net。欧洲的方法强调多方法的必要性和三角测量原则。在北美,加拿大的方法包括大规模和小规模的国际合作,以绘制可持续发展能力图谱。美国的工作包括对预防慢性病和降低风险因素水平的能力进行州级层面的绘制。在澳大利亚,绘制国家健康促进能力的工作开展了二十年,最初是从卫生部门设计和提供有效、高效的健康促进所需的系统入手,现在已扩展到包括社区层面的能力和政策审查。在韩国和日本,能力图谱绘制工作正与欧洲的努力合作新开展起来,这说明了国际健康促进网络的有用性。绘制健康促进能力图谱是发展健康促进能力的一个实际且至关重要的方面。健康促进的新背景既包含新旧挑战,也包含新机遇。由于通信技术的发展和健康促进者国际网络的传播,如今有可能采用大规模、高度协作的方法来绘制能力图谱。然而,在能力图谱绘制中,为适应当地情况的差异,地方差异始终很重要。