Pagel N, Dick H B, Krummenauer F
Bereich Klinische Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007 Feb;224(2):101-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927403.
Supplementation of cataract patients with multifocal intraocular lenses involves an additional financial investment when compared to the corresponding monofocal supplementation, which usually is not funded by German health care insurers. In the context of recent resource allocation discussions, however, the cost effectiveness of multifocal cataract surgery could become an important rationale. Therefore an evidence-based estimation of its cost effectiveness was carried out.
Three independent meta-analyses were implemented to estimate the gain in uncorrected near visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity (vision lines) as well as the predictability (fraction of patients without need for reading aids) of multifocal supplementation. Study reports published between 1995 and 2004 (English or German language) were screened for appropriate key words. Meta effects in visual gain and predictability were estimated by means and standard deviations of the reported effect measures. Cost data were estimated by German DRG rates and individual lens costs; the cost effectiveness of multifocal cataract surgery was then computed in terms of its marginal cost effectiveness ratio (MCER) for each clinical benefit endpoint; the incremental costs of multifocal versus monofocal cataract surgery were further estimated by means of their respective incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). An independent meta-analysis estimated the complication profiles to be expected after monofocal and multifocal cataract surgery in order to evaluate expectable complication-associated additional costs of both procedures; the marginal and incremental cost effectiveness estimates were adjusted accordingly. A sensitivity analysis comprised cost variations of +/- 10 % and utility variations alongside the meta effect estimate's 95 % confidence intervals.
Total direct costs from the health care insurer's perspective were estimated 3363 euro, associated with a visual meta benefit in best corrected visual acuity and near visual acuity of 5.1 lines (95 % confidence interval 3.8 - 6.4 lines) and 6.1 lines (4.7 - 7.5 lines), respectively, and a meta predictability estimate of 81 % (72 - 89 %). The mean MCER for best corrected visual acuity results became 659 euro per gained visual acuity line (sensitivity range 473 - 973 euro). For near visual acuity, a mean MCER of 555 euro (sensitivity range 404 - 787 euro) per gained visual line was found. In terms of incremental costs, multifocal cataract surgery implied an additional mean investment of 63 euro (sensitivity range 0 - 234 euro) per additionally gained near visual acuity line, and 5 euro (0 - 18 euro) per additionally gained percentage point in predictability, when compared to monofocal cataract surgery as the standard treatment. The meta-analysis on complication profiles revealed posterior capsule opacification (meta incidence 20 %) and vitreous loss (meta incidence 2 %) as the complications to be expected most frequently. The cost adjustment for expectable complication patterns after multifocal cataract surgery implied total direct costs of 3491 euro, resulting in marginal costs of 576 euro per line (sensitivity range 419 - 817 euro per line) gained in near visual acuity and 684 euro per line (491 - 1011 euro per line) gained in best corrected visual acuity.
Bearing incremental costs of 63 euro per additionally gained vision line (near visual acuity) in mind, multifocal cataract surgery comprises a cost effective alternative to the monofocal standard treatment.
与相应的单焦点人工晶状体植入相比,为白内障患者植入多焦点人工晶状体需要额外的经济投入,而德国医疗保险公司通常不承担这笔费用。然而,在最近关于资源分配的讨论中,多焦点白内障手术的成本效益可能成为一个重要的考量因素。因此,我们对其成本效益进行了基于证据的评估。
进行了三项独立的荟萃分析,以评估多焦点人工晶状体植入在未矫正近视力和最佳矫正视力(视力行数)方面的改善,以及其可预测性(无需阅读辅助工具的患者比例)。筛选了1995年至2004年间发表的研究报告(英文或德文),查找合适的关键词。通过报告的效应指标的均值和标准差来估计视力改善和可预测性方面的荟萃效应。成本数据根据德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)费率和单个晶状体成本进行估算;然后根据每个临床效益终点的边际成本效益比(MCER)计算多焦点白内障手术的成本效益;通过各自的增量成本效益比(ICER)进一步估算多焦点白内障手术与单焦点白内障手术相比的增量成本。一项独立的荟萃分析估计了单焦点和多焦点白内障手术后预期的并发症情况,以评估两种手术预期的与并发症相关的额外成本;相应地调整边际和增量成本效益估计值。敏感性分析包括成本上下浮动10%以及在荟萃效应估计值的95%置信区间内的效用变化。
从医疗保险公司的角度估计,总直接成本为3363欧元,在最佳矫正视力和近视力方面的视觉荟萃效益分别为5.1行(95%置信区间3.8 - 6.4行)和6.1行(4.7 - 7.5行),荟萃可预测性估计值为81%(72 - 89%)。最佳矫正视力结果的平均MCER为每提高一行视力659欧元(敏感性范围473 - 973欧元)。对于近视力,每提高一行视力的平均MCER为555欧元(敏感性范围404 - 787欧元)。在增量成本方面,与作为标准治疗的单焦点白内障手术相比,多焦点白内障手术每额外提高一行近视力平均需要额外投入63欧元(敏感性范围0 - 234欧元),每额外提高一个百分点的可预测性需要额外投入5欧元(0 - 18欧元)。关于并发症情况的荟萃分析显示,后囊膜混浊(荟萃发生率20%)和玻璃体丢失(荟萃发生率2%)是最常见的预期并发症。多焦点白内障手术后预期并发症模式的成本调整后,总直接成本为3491欧元,导致近视力每提高一行的边际成本为576欧元(敏感性范围每行419 - 817欧元),最佳矫正视力每提高一行的边际成本为684欧元(每行491 - 1011欧元)。
考虑到每额外提高一行视力(近视力)的增量成本为63欧元,多焦点白内障手术是单焦点标准治疗的一种具有成本效益的替代方案。