• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量抗菌药物治疗急性中耳炎的相对疗效:“盲目乐观现象”

Measuring the comparative efficacy of antibacterial agents for acute otitis media: the "Pollyanna phenomenon".

作者信息

Marchant C D, Carlin S A, Johnson C E, Shurin P A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1992 Jan;120(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80601-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80601-8
PMID:1731027
Abstract

In randomized, double-blind trials of antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media that determined both clinical and bacteriologic outcomes, clinical success rates were (93%) 236 of 253 for patients with bacteriologic success, (62%) 25 of 40 for those with bacteriologic failure, and (80%) 124 of 155 for those with nonbacterial acute otitis media. These rates were used to calculate the effectiveness of three strategies for assessing drug efficacy: (1) tympanocentesis and culture before and during therapy (bacteriologic efficacy), (2) tympanocentesis before therapy and assessment of clinical efficacy in bacterial acute otitis media, and (3) no tympanocentesis and assessment of clinical efficacy in clinical (total) acute otitis media. For a drug with a bacteriologic efficacy of 100%, calculated clinical efficacy was 93% for bacterial acute otitis media and 89% for clinical acute otitis media. For a drug with bacteriologic efficacy of 27%, a rate consistent with no antibacterial therapy, efficacy was 71% for bacterial acute otitis media and 74% for clinical acute otitis media. We conclude that if efficacy is measured by symptomatic response, drugs with excellent antibacterial activity will appear less efficacious than they really are and drugs with poor antibacterial activity will appear more efficacious than they really are. The predominant phenomenon is that drugs with poor antibacterial activity will appear to be clinically effective in the treatment of acute otitis media.

摘要

在针对急性中耳炎的抗生素治疗进行的随机双盲试验中,该试验确定了临床和细菌学结果,细菌学检查成功的患者临床成功率为(93%),即253例中的236例;细菌学检查失败的患者临床成功率为(62%),即40例中的25例;非细菌性急性中耳炎患者临床成功率为(80%),即155例中的124例。这些比率被用于计算三种评估药物疗效策略的有效性:(1)治疗前和治疗期间进行鼓膜穿刺和培养(细菌学疗效);(2)治疗前进行鼓膜穿刺并评估细菌性急性中耳炎的临床疗效;(3)不进行鼓膜穿刺并评估临床(总体)急性中耳炎的临床疗效。对于一种细菌学疗效为100%的药物,计算得出细菌性急性中耳炎的临床疗效为93%,临床急性中耳炎的临床疗效为89%。对于一种细菌学疗效为27%(与不进行抗菌治疗的比率一致)的药物,细菌性急性中耳炎的疗效为71%,临床急性中耳炎的疗效为74%。我们得出结论,如果通过症状反应来衡量疗效,具有优异抗菌活性的药物看起来比其实际疗效要低,而抗菌活性差的药物看起来比其实际疗效要高。主要现象是抗菌活性差的药物在治疗急性中耳炎时似乎具有临床疗效。

相似文献

1
Measuring the comparative efficacy of antibacterial agents for acute otitis media: the "Pollyanna phenomenon".测量抗菌药物治疗急性中耳炎的相对疗效:“盲目乐观现象”
J Pediatr. 1992 Jan;120(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80601-8.
2
Bacteriology of acute otitis media: a new perspective.急性中耳炎的细菌学:一个新视角。
J Pediatr. 1992 Jan;120(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80605-5.
3
Cefixime compared with amoxicillin for treatment of acute otitis media.
J Pediatr. 1991 Jul;119(1 Pt 1):117-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81051-0.
4
A randomized controlled trial of amoxicillin plus clavulanate compared with cefaclor for treatment of acute otitis media.阿莫西林加克拉维酸与头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的随机对照试验。
J Pediatr. 1986 Nov;109(5):891-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80721-1.
5
Bacteriologic failure of amoxicillin-clavulanate in treatment of acute otitis media caused by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗由非分型流感嗜血杆菌引起的急性中耳炎时的细菌学失败
J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):799-806. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70415-9.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety evaluation of cefaclor vs amoxycillin + clavulanate in children with Acute Otitis Media (AOM).头孢克洛与阿莫西林+克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的疗效与安全性比较评估
Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Mar;72(3):233-8.
7
Multi-investigator evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cefprozil, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media.多位研究者对头孢丙烯、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢克肟和头孢克洛治疗急性中耳炎的疗效和安全性进行的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):857-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02111353.
8
Host factors and early therapeutic response in acute otitis media.急性中耳炎的宿主因素与早期治疗反应
J Pediatr. 1991 Feb;118(2):178-83. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80479-2.
9
Double-blind comparison of cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.头孢克肟与头孢克洛治疗儿童急性中耳炎的双盲比较
Scand J Infect Dis. 1991;23(4):459-65. doi: 10.3109/00365549109075094.
10
Acute otitis media caused by Branhamella catarrhalis: biology and therapy.卡他布兰汉菌引起的急性中耳炎:生物学与治疗
Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Jan-Feb;9(1):16-27. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.1.16.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-dose (30 mg/kg) azithromycin compared with 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of uncomplicated acute otitis media: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.单剂量(30毫克/千克)阿奇霉素与10天阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗非复杂性急性中耳炎的疗效比较:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003;64:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2003.09.006.
2
Current opinion in the management in acute otitis media.急性中耳炎治疗的当前观点。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Apr;50(2):156-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02991679.
3
Comparison of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid high dose with cefdinir in the treatment of acute otitis media.
阿莫西林/克拉维酸高剂量与头孢地尼治疗急性中耳炎的比较。
Drugs. 2012 Oct 22;72(15):1991-7. doi: 10.2165/11590320-000000000-00000.
4
Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials against Mycoplasma mycoides mycoides small colony, the causative agent of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia.抗微生物药物对引起传染性牛胸膜肺炎的支原体(mycoplasma mycoides mycoides small colony)的药效学研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044158. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
5
Prediction of delayed recovery from pediatric community-acquired pneumonia.预测儿童社区获得性肺炎的延迟恢复。
Ital J Pediatr. 2010 Jul 29;36:51. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-36-51.
6
Appropriate treatment of acute otitis media in the era of antibiotic resistance.抗生素耐药时代急性中耳炎的恰当治疗。
Paediatr Drugs. 2010 Jun 29;12 Suppl 1:3-9. doi: 10.2165/11538720-S0-000000000-00002.
7
Recommendations for treatment of childhood non-severe pneumonia.儿童非重症肺炎的治疗建议。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;9(3):185-96. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70044-1.
8
Effectiveness and safety of short vs. long duration of antibiotic therapy for acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.短期与长期抗生素治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的有效性和安全性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;67(2):161-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03306.x. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
9
Pharmacodynamic target attainment of oral beta-lactams for the empiric treatment of acute otitis media in children.口服β-内酰胺类药物用于儿童急性中耳炎经验性治疗的药效学靶点达成情况。
Paediatr Drugs. 2008;10(5):329-35. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200810050-00006.
10
Fluoroquinolones compared with beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氟喹诺酮类药物与β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2008 Mar 25;178(7):845-54. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071157.