Wright James R, Ung Yee C, Julian Jim A, Pritchard Kathleen I, Whelan Timothy J, Smith Column, Szechtman Barbara, Roa Wilson, Mulroy Liam, Rudinskas Leona, Gagnon Bruno, Okawara Gord S, Levine Mark N
Juravinski Cancer Center at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar 20;25(9):1027-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1514. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
Previous trials have suggested a quality-of-life (QOL) improvement for anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoietin, but few used QOL as the primary outcome. We designed a trial to investigate the effects of epoetin alfa therapy on the QOL of anemic patients with advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC).
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. The proposed sample size was 300 patients. Eligible patients were required to have NSCLC unsuitable for curative therapy and baseline hemoglobin (Hgb) levels less than 121 g/L. Patients were assigned to 12 weekly injections of subcutaneous epoetin alpha or placebo, targeting Hgb levels between 120 and 140 g/L. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scores between baseline and 12 weeks.
Reports of thrombotic events in other epoetin trials prompted an unplanned safety analysis after 70 patients had been randomly assigned (33 to the active arm and 37 to the placebo arm). This revealed a significant difference in the median survival in favor of the patients on the placebo arm of the trial (63 v 129 days; hazard ratio, 1.84; P = .04). The Steering Committee closed the trial. Patient numbers compromised the interpretation of the QOL analysis, but a positive Hgb response was noted with epoetin alfa treatment.
An unplanned safety analysis suggested decreased overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with epoetin alfa. Although infrequent, other similar reports highlight the need for ongoing trials evaluating erythropoietin receptor agonists to ensure that overall survival is monitored closely.
既往试验提示,接受促红细胞生成素治疗的贫血癌症患者生活质量(QOL)有所改善,但很少有试验将QOL作为主要结局。我们设计了一项试验,以研究阿法依泊汀治疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)贫血患者QOL的影响。
进行了一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。计划样本量为300例患者。符合条件的患者须患有不宜进行根治性治疗的NSCLC且基线血红蛋白(Hgb)水平低于121 g/L。患者被分配接受每周1次、共12次的皮下注射阿法依泊汀或安慰剂,目标Hgb水平为120至140 g/L。主要结局是基线至12周期间癌症治疗-贫血功能评估评分变化的差异。
其他依泊汀试验中血栓事件的报告促使在70例患者被随机分组后(33例至活性治疗组,37例至安慰剂组)进行了一次非计划的安全性分析。这显示试验安慰剂组患者的中位生存期有显著差异(63天对129天;风险比,1.84;P = .04)。指导委员会终止了试验。患者数量影响了QOL分析的解释,但阿法依泊汀治疗观察到了Hgb的阳性反应。
一次非计划的安全性分析提示,接受阿法依泊汀治疗的晚期NSCLC患者总生存期降低。尽管此类情况不常见,但其他类似报告强调,需要持续进行评估促红细胞生成素受体激动剂的试验,以确保密切监测总生存期。