Bolen Jennifer
The Legal Side of Pain, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
J Opioid Manag. 2005 Sep-Oct;1(4):185-92. doi: 10.5055/jom.2005.0040.
In Part I of this series, I discussed the basic role of the law in the decision-making process for opioid management. I set out three basic rules: 1) read and learn applicable federal and state legal/regulatory materials on using controlled substances to treat pain, 2) stay current on accepted clinical standards of care, and 3) use a compliance program to minimize the potential for abuse and diversion of controlled substances. Here in Part II, I focus on the third rule and offer a few suggestions on developing and maintaining a compliance program. I also discuss using language from legal/regulatory materials in your practice forms in a manner that, once again, allows you to "take back your turf" and prescribe opioids without fear of legal/regulatory sanction (see Disclaimer). Take a minute to review the self-audit questions that follow and see where you stand on your knowledge and use of legal/regulatory matters in your daily practice. More "yes" answers indicate better knowledge of key compliance and documentation issues. More "no" and "I don't know" answers indicate that more work should be done to minimize potential legal/regulatory compliance problems in your practice.
在本系列的第一部分中,我讨论了法律在阿片类药物管理决策过程中的基本作用。我列出了三条基本规则:1)阅读并学习关于使用管制药品治疗疼痛的适用联邦和州法律/监管材料,2)紧跟公认的临床护理标准,3)使用合规计划以尽量减少管制药品滥用和转移的可能性。在第二部分中,我将重点关注第三条规则,并就制定和维护合规计划提供一些建议。我还将讨论如何在你的执业表格中使用法律/监管材料中的语言,这再次让你能够“夺回你的地盘”,在无惧法律/监管制裁的情况下开具阿片类药物处方(见免责声明)。花一分钟时间回顾一下下面的自我审计问题,看看你在日常执业中对法律/监管事项的了解和运用情况如何。更多的“是”答案表明对关键合规和文件问题有更好的了解。更多的“否”和“我不知道”答案表明需要做更多工作,以尽量减少你执业中潜在的法律/监管合规问题。