Dermatas Dimitris, Chrysochoou Maria, Pardali Sarra, Grubb Dennis G
W.M. Keck Geoenvironmental Laboratory, Castle Point on Hudson, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2007 Mar 1;36(2):487-97. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0215. Print 2007 Mar-Apr.
Powders of chromite ore processing residue (COPR) were mineralogically evaluated using quantitative X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) to illustrate the impacts of sample preparation procedures. Chromite ore processing residue is strongly alkaline, reactive, contains minerals of varying hardness and absorption coefficients, and exhibits significant amorphicity. This poses a challenge to produce powders for XRPD analysis that are sufficiently fine and of uniform particle size while avoiding mineral reactions and overgrinding effects. Dry, hand pulverization to different grain sizes, and wet, mechanical pulverization (micromilling) using four milling liquids (cyclohexane, isopropanol, ethanol, and water), and variable milling durations (up to 15 min) were evaluated. Micromilling with a light, nonpolar, highly evaporative liquid such as cyclohexane with a milling time of 5 min mitigated systematic errors such as microabsorption and preferred orientation as it produced finer and more uniform particle size distributions than the hand-pulverized powders, while simultaneously affording the least time for sample preparation. Conversely, the use of water as milling liquid resulted in extensive hydration reactions during sample preparation, causing mischaracterization and significant underestimation of its reactive brownmillerite content, which can complicate the remediation design process for COPR. Hand pulverization emerged as a necessary complement to quantify Cr(VI)-containing, softer minerals destroyed during mechanical milling, the quantification of which has also important implications for COPR treatment design. The findings of this study may be applicable in a variety of geochemically complicated and reactive environmental media (metal-contaminated soils, stabilized/solidified media, inorganic waste), and points to the importance of the sample preparation method to obtain reliable quantitative XRPD results.
采用定量X射线粉末衍射(XRPD)对铬铁矿选矿废渣(COPR)粉末进行矿物学评估,以阐明样品制备程序的影响。铬铁矿选矿废渣具有强碱性、反应活性,含有硬度和吸收系数各异的矿物,且呈现出显著的非晶态。这对制备用于XRPD分析的粉末构成了挑战,即要足够细且粒度均匀,同时避免矿物反应和过度研磨效应。评估了将样品干式手工研磨至不同粒度,以及使用四种研磨液(环己烷、异丙醇、乙醇和水)进行湿式机械研磨(微粉化)并改变研磨时间(最长15分钟)的情况。使用轻质、非极性、高挥发性液体(如环己烷)进行5分钟的微粉化,可减轻诸如微吸收和择优取向等系统误差,因为与手工研磨的粉末相比,它能产生更细且更均匀的粒度分布,同时样品制备所需时间最短。相反,使用水作为研磨液会在样品制备过程中引发大量水合反应,导致对其活性钙铁榴石含量的错误表征和严重低估,这会使COPR的修复设计过程变得复杂。手工研磨成为对机械研磨过程中被破坏的含Cr(VI)的较软矿物进行定量的必要补充,对这些矿物的定量分析对COPR处理设计也具有重要意义。本研究的结果可能适用于各种地球化学复杂且具有反应活性的环境介质(金属污染土壤、稳定化/固化介质、无机废物),并指出了样品制备方法对于获得可靠的定量XRPD结果的重要性。