Lianou Alexandra, Geornaras Ifigenia, Kendall Patricia A, Belk Keith E, Scanga John A, Smith Gary C, Sofos John N
Center for Red Meat Safety, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1171, USA.
J Food Prot. 2007 Feb;70(2):378-85. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.2.378.
Commercial cured ham formulated with or without potassium lactate and sodium diacetate was inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes and stored to simulate conditions of processing, retail, and home storage. The ham was sliced, inoculated with a 10-strain composite of L. monocytogenes (1 to 2 log CFU/cm2), vacuum packaged, and stored at 4 degrees C to simulate contamination following lethality treatment at processing (first shelf life). After 10, 20, 35, and 60 days of storage, packages were opened, samples were tested, and bags with remaining slices were reclosed with rubber bands. At the same times, portions of original product (stored at 4 degrees C in original processing bags) were sliced, inoculated, and packaged in delicatessen bags to simulate contamination during slicing at retail (second shelf life). Aerobic storage of both sets of packages at 7 degrees C for 12 days was used to reflect domestic storage conditions (home storage). L. monocytogenes populations were lower (P < 0.05) during storage in ham formulated with lactate-diacetate than in product without antimicrobials under both contamination scenarios. Inoculation of ham without lactate-diacetate allowed prolific growth of L. monocytogenes in vacuum packages during the first shelf life and was the worst case contamination scenario with respect to pathogen numbers encountered during home storage. Under the second shelf life contamination scenario, mean growth rates of the organism during home storage ranged from 0.32 to 0.45 and from 0.18 to 0.25 log CFU/cm2/day for ham without and with lactate-diacetate, respectively, and significant increases in pathogen numbers (P < 0.05) were generally observed after 4 and 8 days of storage, respectively. Regardless of contamination scenario, 12-day home storage of product without lactate-diacetate resulted in similar pathogen populations (6.0 to 6.9 log CFU/cm2) (P > 0.05). In ham containing lactate-diacetate, similar counts were found during the home storage experiment under both contamination scenarios, and only in 60-day-old product did samples from the first shelf life have higher (P < 0.05) pathogen numbers than those found in samples from the second shelf life. These results should be useful in risk assessments and for the establishment of "sell by" and "consume by" date labels for refrigerated ready-to-eat meat products.
将添加了或未添加乳酸钾和双乙酸钠的市售腌制火腿接种单核细胞增生李斯特菌,并进行储存,以模拟加工、零售和家庭储存条件。将火腿切片,接种单核细胞增生李斯特菌的10菌株复合物(1至2 log CFU/cm²),真空包装,并储存在4℃下,以模拟加工过程中致死处理后的污染情况(第一保质期)。储存10、20、35和60天后,打开包装,检测样品,并用橡皮筋重新封好装有剩余切片的袋子。同时,将部分原始产品(在原始加工袋中于4℃下储存)切片、接种,并包装在熟食袋中,以模拟零售切片过程中的污染情况(第二保质期)。将两组包装在7℃下需氧储存12天,以反映家庭储存条件。在两种污染情况下,添加乳酸 - 双乙酸钠的火腿在储存期间的单核细胞增生李斯特菌数量均低于(P < 0.05)未添加抗菌剂的产品。未添加乳酸 - 双乙酸钠的火腿接种后,在第一保质期内真空包装中的单核细胞增生李斯特菌大量生长,并且就家庭储存期间遇到的病原体数量而言,这是最糟糕的污染情况。在第二保质期污染情况下,家庭储存期间该菌的平均生长速率,未添加乳酸 - 双乙酸钠的火腿为0.32至0.45 log CFU/cm²/天,添加乳酸 - 双乙酸钠的火腿为0.18至0.25 log CFU/cm²/天,并且通常分别在储存4天和8天后观察到病原体数量显著增加(P < 0.05)。无论污染情况如何,未添加乳酸 - 双乙酸钠的产品进行12天家庭储存后,病原体数量相似(6.0至6.9 log CFU/cm²)(P > 0.05)。在含有乳酸 - 双乙酸钠的火腿中,在两种污染情况下的家庭储存实验中发现了相似的计数,并且仅在60日龄的产品中,第一保质期的样品病原体数量高于(P < 0.05)第二保质期的样品。这些结果应有助于进行风险评估,并为冷藏即食肉制品建立“销售截止日期”和“食用截止日期”标签。