Mitchel R E, Trivedi A
AECL Research, Radiation Biology Branch, Chalk River Laboratories, Ontario, Canada.
Radiat Res. 1992 Feb;129(2):192-201.
We have tested chronic exposure to 90Y beta radiation for its action as a complete tumor promoter, a stage I tumor promoter, or a stage II tumor promoter in SENCAR mouse skin. In skin initiated with a single application of 7,12,dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA, 10 nmol), chronic exposure to beta radiation as a complete promoter (0.5 Gy, twice/week, 13 weeks) produced no tumors and, when added to a complete chemical promoter (TPA), reduced tumor frequency about 30%. A similar result was observed when beta radiation was tested as a stage II promoter. DMBA-initiated mice that received chemical (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, TPA) stage I promotion followed by 13 weeks of beta-radiation exposure (0.5 Gy, twice/week) as stage II promotion produced essentially no tumors, and combining the same chronic beta-radiation exposure with chemical (mezerein) stage II promotion reduced tumor frequency about 20% when compared to a similar group that was not irradiated. Chronic beta-radiation exposure was tested two ways as a stage I tumor promoter in initiated skin that was subsequently treated with mezerein as a stage II promoter. Stage I promotion was shown to proceed with the passage of time, indicating this process occurs naturally in the absence of chemical or physical stimulation. Hyperthermia, previously shown to be a potent inhibitor of chemically stimulated stage I promotion, had no effect on the natural process, indicating at least some differences in mechanism between the two processes. The natural process was, in fact, inhibited by chemical tumor promoters, but not by radiation. In addition to the increase resulting from this natural process, tumor frequency was further increased slightly but significantly (12-15%, P less than or equal to 0.05) when chronic radiation exposure was given as a stage I promoter (0.5 Gy, twice/week, 13 weeks) subsequent to initiation, in spite of the expected 20% reduction resulting from this dose. Exposure of initiated animals to radiation (0.5 or 1.0 Gy, twice/week, 2 weeks) in addition to TPA as stage I promotion produced a similar increase in tumor frequency (P less than 0.02). At higher radiation doses, however, tumor frequency was reduced compared to unirradiated controls. In a third test as a stage I promoter, beta radiation (0.5 Gy twice/week, 4 weeks) was given prior to initiation with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in animals subsequently promoted by TPA (twice/week, 13 weeks), and again the radiation slightly but significantly (P less than 0.03) increased tumor frequency compared to the unirradiated control group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们已测试了长期暴露于90Yβ辐射在SENCAR小鼠皮肤中作为完全肿瘤启动剂、I期肿瘤启动剂或II期肿瘤启动剂的作用。在单次涂抹7,12-二甲基苯并[a]蒽(DMBA,10 nmol)启动的皮肤中,作为完全启动剂长期暴露于β辐射(0.5 Gy,每周两次,共13周)未产生肿瘤,并且当添加到完全化学启动剂(TPA)中时,肿瘤发生率降低了约30%。当将β辐射作为II期启动剂进行测试时,观察到了类似的结果。接受化学(12-O-十四烷酰佛波醇-13-乙酸酯,TPA)I期启动,随后作为II期启动接受13周β辐射暴露(0.5 Gy,每周两次)的DMBA启动小鼠基本未产生肿瘤,与未接受辐射的类似组相比,将相同的长期β辐射暴露与化学(大风子素)II期启动相结合,肿瘤发生率降低了约20%。在启动的皮肤中,以两种方式测试了长期β辐射暴露作为I期肿瘤启动剂,随后用大风子素作为II期启动剂进行处理。I期启动显示随着时间推移而进行,表明该过程在没有化学或物理刺激的情况下自然发生。热疗以前被证明是化学刺激I期启动的有效抑制剂,对自然过程没有影响,表明这两个过程在机制上至少存在一些差异。事实上,自然过程受到化学肿瘤启动剂的抑制,但不受辐射的抑制。除了这种自然过程导致的增加外,在启动后作为I期启动剂给予长期辐射暴露(0.5 Gy,每周两次,共13周)时,尽管该剂量预期会使肿瘤发生率降低20%,但肿瘤发生率仍略有但显著增加(12 - 15%,P≤0.05)。除了TPA作为I期启动外,将启动的动物暴露于辐射(0.5或1.0 Gy,每周两次,共2周)也使肿瘤发生率有类似的增加(P<0.02)。然而,在较高辐射剂量下,与未辐射的对照组相比,肿瘤发生率降低。在作为I期启动剂的第三次测试中,在动物用N-甲基-N'-硝基-N-亚硝基胍启动之前给予β辐射(0.5 Gy每周两次,共4周),随后用TPA(每周两次,共13周)进行促进,与未辐射的对照组相比,辐射再次使肿瘤发生率略有但显著增加(P<0.03)。(摘要截断于400字)