Schneider Antonius, Wensing Michel, Quinzler Renate, Bieber Christiane, Szecsenyi Joachim
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Vossstrasse 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jul;67(1-2):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.019. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
To investigate the interrelations between medication adherence, self-management, preference for involvement in treatment decisions and preference for information in asthma patients in primary care.
One hundred and eighty-five patients from 43 practices completed a series of questionnaires, which included the 'Autonomy Preference Index' (API) [range=0-100], the four-item Morisky self-report medication adherence questionnaire and structured questions about asthma severity, medication and self-management.
The mean (S.D.) for participation preference was 34.5 (15.3) whereas the mean (S.D.) for information preference was 91.1 (9.7). Higher participation preference was associated with stopping medication when feeling better (OR 1.03; 95%CI 1.01-1.06) or feeling worse (OR 1.02; 95%CI 1.0-1.05) but it was not related to asthma severity. Higher information preference was associated with non-adherence to medication (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.166; p=0.035) as well as the wish to receive asthma education (p=0.04) and usage of peak flow meter (p=0.05).
Participation preference was low in general. Higher preference for involvement may entail more motivation for self-management but also lower medication adherence. This may be explained by a continuous internal negotiation process to accept the potentially lifelong demands of the disease.
Patients with lower medication adherence may possibly be addressed and empowered by their enhanced preference for participation in treatment decisions. Physicians offering to share treatment decisions may utilise the patients' participation preference to enhance medication adherence. Due to varying participation preferences, optimal patient preference matching, which involves more flexible use of different communication styles, may be necessary to improve outcomes.
探讨基层医疗中哮喘患者的药物依从性、自我管理、参与治疗决策偏好和信息偏好之间的相互关系。
来自43家医疗机构的185名患者完成了一系列问卷调查,其中包括“自主偏好指数”(API)[范围=0 - 100]、四项版的Morisky自我报告药物依从性问卷以及关于哮喘严重程度、药物治疗和自我管理的结构化问题。
参与偏好的均值(标准差)为34.5(15.3),而信息偏好的均值(标准差)为91.1(9.7)。较高的参与偏好与感觉好转(比值比1.03;95%置信区间1.01 - 1.06)或感觉恶化(比值比1.02;95%置信区间1.0 - 1.05)时停药有关,但与哮喘严重程度无关。较高的信息偏好与药物不依从(斯皮尔曼相关系数0.166;p = 0.035)以及接受哮喘教育的愿望(p = 0.04)和使用峰值流量计(p = 0.05)有关。
总体而言,参与偏好较低。更高的参与偏好可能意味着更强的自我管理动机,但也意味着更低的药物依从性。这可能是由于一个持续的内部协商过程,以接受疾病可能带来的终身需求。
药物依从性较低的患者可能会因其对参与治疗决策的偏好增强而得到关注并获得更多自主权。主动提出分享治疗决策的医生可以利用患者的参与偏好来提高药物依从性。由于参与偏好各不相同,可能需要进行最佳的患者偏好匹配,包括更灵活地使用不同的沟通方式,以改善治疗效果。