Maheswaran Ravi, Pearson Tim, Munro James, Jiwa Moyez, Campbell Michael J, Nicholl Jon
Public Health GIS Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA.
BMJ. 2007 Apr 21;334(7598):838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39122.704051.55. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
To examine whether walk-in centres contribute to shorter waiting times for a general practice appointment.
Ecological study.
2509 general practices in 56 primary care trusts in England; 32 walk-in centres within 3 km of one of these practices.
Waiting time to next available general practitioner appointment (April 2003 to December 2004), from national monthly primary care access survey.
The percentage of practices achieving the target waiting time of less than 48 hours to see a general practitioner increased from 67% to 87% over the 21 month study period (adjusted odds ratio 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.08) per increase in month). Achievement of the waiting time target decreased with increasing multiple deprivation (0.57 (0.49 to 0.67) for most versus least deprived third) and increased with increasing practice population size (1.02 (1.00 to 1.04) per 1000 increase). No evidence was found that increasing distance from a walk-in centre was associated with decreasing odds of achieving the waiting time target (1.00 (0.99 to 1.01) per km increase). Increasing "exposure" to a walk-in centre, modelled with a distance decay function based on attendance rates, also showed little evidence of association with achievement of the waiting time target (1.02 (0.97 to 1.08) for interquartile range increase). No evidence existed that the rate of increase in achieving the 48 hour target over time was enhanced by proximity or "exposure" to a walk-in centre. Results were similar when the analysis was rerun with data for 2003 only (done because pressure in 2004 to meet the government's deadline might have led to other changes that could have masked any walk-in centre effect).
No evidence existed that walk-in centres shortened waiting times for access to primary care, and the results do not support the use of walk-in centres for this purpose.
研究即看即诊中心是否有助于缩短全科医疗预约的等待时间。
生态学研究。
英格兰56个初级医疗信托机构中的2509家全科诊所;其中一家诊所3公里范围内的32家即看即诊中心。
根据全国每月初级医疗可及性调查,计算下次可预约全科医生的等待时间(2003年4月至2004年12月)。
在21个月的研究期间,能够达到看全科医生等待时间少于48小时这一目标的诊所比例从67%增至87%(每月增加的调整比值比为1.07(95%置信区间为1.06至1.08))。随着多重贫困程度的增加,达到等待时间目标的比例下降(最贫困的三分之一地区与最不贫困的三分之一地区相比为0.57(0.49至0.67)),且随着诊所人口规模的增加而上升(每增加1000人,比值比为1.02(1.00至1.04))。未发现有证据表明距离即看即诊中心越远,达到等待时间目标的几率越低(每增加1公里,比值比为1.00(0.99至1.01))。根据就诊率采用距离衰减函数模拟的对即看即诊中心的“暴露”增加,也几乎没有证据表明与达到等待时间目标有关(四分位间距增加时,比值比为1.02(0.97至1.08))。没有证据表明接近或“暴露”于即看即诊中心会提高随着时间推移达到48小时目标的增加率。仅使用2003年的数据重新进行分析时结果相似(这样做是因为2004年为满足政府最后期限的压力可能导致了其他变化,从而掩盖了任何即看即诊中心的效果)。
没有证据表明即看即诊中心缩短了获得初级医疗服务的等待时间,结果不支持为此目的使用即看即诊中心。