Onyeaso Chukwudi Ochi
Department of Child Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, College of Medicine/University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Mar 1;8(3):37-44.
The aim of this retrospective analytical study was to assess the relationship between the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) on the orthodontic treatment need and complexity in a group of Nigerian patients.
Fifty-six cases were randomly selected from the model storage of the orthodontic unit of the University College Hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. The ICON was used to assess the pre-treatment study models for orthodontic treatment need and complexity of the cases while the DAI was also used to assess the same cases for treatment need. Descriptive statistics as well as the non-parametric (Spearman Rank-Order and Pearson's Product Moment) correlations were used to analyze the data.
The mean ICON and DAI scores were 67.38+/-19.63 (SD) and 42.27+/-12 .66 (SD), respectively. Both the ICON and DAI agreed that one (1.8%) case did not need treatment while 46 (82.1%) needed treatment. All the difficult and very difficult cases according to the ICON were assessed as needing treatment by the DAI with 18 (13.1%) out of 22 (39.3%) in the very difficult category belonging to the handicapping group where treatment was mandatory. In all positive significant correlations were recorded for the ICON and DAI scores.
The ICON and DAI showed favorable agreement when used to assess treatment needs through the use of study casts. The ICON could be a good substitute for the DAI in assessing pre-treatment needs of Nigerian patients.
本回顾性分析研究旨在评估一组尼日利亚患者的牙齿美学指数(DAI)与复杂程度、治疗结果及需求指数(ICON)在正畸治疗需求和复杂程度方面的关系。
从尼日利亚伊巴丹大学学院医院正畸科的模型库中随机选取56例病例。使用ICON评估病例的正畸治疗需求和复杂程度的治疗前研究模型,同时使用DAI评估相同病例的治疗需求。采用描述性统计以及非参数(斯皮尔曼等级相关和皮尔逊积矩相关)相关性分析数据。
ICON和DAI的平均得分分别为67.38±19.63(标准差)和42.27±12.66(标准差)。ICON和DAI均认为1例(1.8%)病例不需要治疗,而46例(82.1%)需要治疗。根据ICON所有困难和非常困难的病例,DAI评估均为需要治疗,在22例(39.3%)非常困难的病例中有18例(13.1%)属于必须治疗且有缺陷的类别。ICON和DAI得分均记录为显著正相关。
当通过使用研究模型评估治疗需求时,ICON和DAI显示出良好的一致性。在评估尼日利亚患者的治疗前需求时,ICON可以很好地替代DAI。