Fogel Gerald I
Oregon Psychoanalytic Institute, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2006 Fall;54(4):1139-63. doi: 10.1177/00030651060540040801.
Clinical examples are used to illuminate several riddles of masculinity-ambiguities, enigmas, and paradoxes in relation to gender, bisexuality, and thirdness-frequently seen in male patients. Basic psychoanalytic assumptions about male psychology are examined in the light of advances in female psychology, using ideas from feminist and gender studies as well as important and now widely accepted trends in contemporary psychoanalytic theory. By reexamining basic assumptions about heterosexual men, as has been done with ideas concerning women and homosexual men, complexity and nuance come to the fore to aid the clinician in treating the complex characterological pictures seen in men today. In a context of rapid historical and theoretical change, the use of persistent gender stereotypes and unnecessarily limiting theoretical formulations, though often unintended, may mask subtle countertransference and theoretical blind spots, and limit optimal clinical effectiveness.
临床实例用于阐明男性气质的几个谜题——与性别、双性恋和第三性相关的模糊性、谜团和悖论,这些在男性患者中经常出现。结合女性心理学的进展,运用女权主义和性别研究的观点以及当代精神分析理论中重要且现已被广泛接受的趋势,对关于男性心理的基本精神分析假设进行审视。如同对女性和男同性恋者的观念所做的那样,通过重新审视关于异性恋男性的基本假设,复杂性和细微差别得以凸显,以帮助临床医生治疗当今男性中所见的复杂性格特征。在历史和理论快速变化的背景下,持续使用性别刻板印象和不必要地限制理论表述,尽管往往是无意的,但可能掩盖微妙的反移情和理论盲点,并限制最佳临床效果。