Suppr超能文献

替莫唑胺治疗胶质母细胞瘤:首次复发及新诊断病例的给药结果。对于同步方案,是否仍可提出替代方案?

Temozolomide in glioblastoma: results of administration at first relapse and in newly diagnosed cases. Is still proposable an alternative schedule to concomitant protocol?

作者信息

Caroli Manuela, Locatelli Marco, Campanella Rolando, Motta Federica, Mora Annarita, Prada Francesco, Borsa Stefano, Martinelli-Boneschi Filippo, Saladino Andrea, Gaini Sergio Maria

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Sciences, Ospedale Maggiore, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Fondazione Policlinico, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Via F.co Sforza 35, Milano, 20122, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2007 Aug;84(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9343-1. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

Abstract

To evaluate if timing of chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ) was able to modify the outcome of glioblastoma (GBM), we analyzed two comparable series of supratentorial GBM patients, treated with surgery and radiotherapy, in which the administration of TMZ has been performed in the first group at first relapse and in the second group in newly diagnosed cases. The end-points were the median survival, the time tumor progression (TTP) and also the Karnofsky (KPS) scale and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scale at follow-up. From December 1999 to December 2001 30 patients with recurrent GBM received TMZ until progression. From January 2002 to January 2004 38 newly diagnosed patients received a first cycle of TMZ immediately after surgery, and additional cycles after completing radiotherapy until recurrence. In order to obtain a greater drug exposure we adopted a once-daily 10 days schedule of TMZ every 28 days as follows: 150 mg/m(2)/day (day 1-5) and 75 mg/m(2)/day (day 6-10). The first group had a median overall survival of 14 months and a median TTP of 6. The second group had a median survival of 16 months and a median TTP of 10. The difference of TTP was statistically significant (P < 0.001), while the overall survival was not. The values of KPS and MMSE at 12 months demonstrated a better quality of life in the second group (P < 0.01). Our regimen permitted to cover the therapeutic "window" between surgery and the beginning of radiotherapy in newly diagnosed cases and is well tolerated by the patients with limited side effects. We will propose as alternative option when the concomitant radio-chemotherapic protocol is not feasible.

摘要

为评估替莫唑胺(TMZ)化疗时机是否能够改变胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的治疗结果,我们分析了两组幕上GBM患者,这两组患者均接受了手术和放疗,第一组在首次复发时给予TMZ,第二组在新诊断病例中给予TMZ。终点指标为中位生存期、肿瘤进展时间(TTP)以及随访时的卡氏(KPS)评分和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分。1999年12月至2001年12月,30例复发性GBM患者接受TMZ治疗直至病情进展。2002年1月至2004年1月,38例新诊断患者在手术后立即接受首个周期的TMZ治疗,并在完成放疗后接受额外周期治疗直至复发。为了获得更大的药物暴露量,我们采用每28天一次、为期10天的每日一次TMZ给药方案,如下:150mg/m²/天(第1 - 5天)和75mg/m²/天(第6 - 10天)。第一组的中位总生存期为14个月,中位TTP为6个月。第二组的中位生存期为16个月,中位TTP为10个月。TTP的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001),而总生存期无差异。12个月时的KPS和MMSE值显示第二组的生活质量更好(P < 0.01)。我们的方案能够覆盖新诊断病例手术和放疗开始之间的治疗“窗口”,且患者耐受性良好,副作用有限。当同步放化疗方案不可行时,我们将建议将其作为替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验