Roussel Allen J, Fosgate Geoffrey T, Manning Elizabeth J B, Collins Michael T
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Mar 15;230(6):890-5. doi: 10.2460/javma.230.6.890.
To evaluate the seroprevalence of paratuberculosis by use of 2 commercial ELISAs in association with prevalence of fecal shedding of mycobacteria within beef cattle herds.
Cross-sectional field study.
Six beef herds (affected herds; 522 cattle) with and 3 geographically matched herds (181 cattle) without high seroprevalence of paratuberculosis.
Blood and fecal samples were collected from adult cattle and assessed for serum anti-Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis (MAP) antibodies with 2 commercial ELISA kits and submitted for bacterial culture for MAP and environmental bacteria (termed environmental mycobacteria) via a radiometric method, respectively. Species of mycobacterial isolates were identified, and sensitivities and specificities of the 2 ELISAs were compared.
Compared with comparison cattle, cattle from affected herds were 9.4 times as likely to have environmental mycobacteria isolated from feces. Among the 6 affected and 3 comparison herds, the proportions of cattle shedding environmental mycobacteria were 0.225 (range, 0.1 to 0.72) and 0.04 (range, 0 to 0.06), respectively. Although relative MAP- detection specificities (compared with bacterial culture of feces) were different between the 2 ELISAs, sensitivities were not. Nine environmental mycobacterial species were identified from participating herds. All affected herds apparently had > or = 1 bovid infected with MAP, although MAP was not isolated from any cattle in comparison herds.
In beef herds with persistently high rates of false- positive ELISA results, which may be associated with recovery of environmental myco- bacteria from feces, organism detection via bacterial culture of feces or PCR assay should direct paratuberculosis control measures.
通过使用两种商用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法,并结合肉牛群中分枝杆菌粪便排菌率,评估副结核病的血清流行率。
横断面现场研究。
6个副结核病血清高流行率的肉牛群(受影响牛群;522头牛)和3个地理位置匹配的副结核病血清低流行率牛群(181头牛)。
采集成年牛的血液和粪便样本,使用两种商用ELISA试剂盒检测血清抗副结核分枝杆菌(MAP)抗体,并分别通过放射性测量法对MAP和环境细菌(称为环境分枝杆菌)进行细菌培养。鉴定分枝杆菌分离株的种类,并比较两种ELISA的敏感性和特异性。
与对照牛相比,受影响牛群的牛粪便中分离出环境分枝杆菌的可能性高9.4倍。在6个受影响牛群和3个对照牛群中,粪便排环境分枝杆菌的牛的比例分别为0.225(范围为0.1至0.72)和0.04(范围为0至0.06)。尽管两种ELISA之间相对MAP检测特异性(与粪便细菌培养相比)不同,但敏感性相同。从参与研究的牛群中鉴定出9种环境分枝杆菌。所有受影响牛群显然都有≥1头感染MAP的牛,尽管对照牛群中未从任何牛中分离出MAP。
在ELISA结果持续出现高假阳性率的肉牛群中,这可能与粪便中环境分枝杆菌的检出有关,通过粪便细菌培养或聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测病原体应指导副结核病的控制措施。