Suppr超能文献

参数化(R)-[11C]PK11195结合图像的统计参数映射分析:血浆输入与参考组织参数化方法

SPM analysis of parametric (R)-[11C]PK11195 binding images: plasma input versus reference tissue parametric methods.

作者信息

Schuitemaker Alie, van Berckel Bart N M, Kropholler Marc A, Veltman Dick J, Scheltens Philip, Jonker Cees, Lammertsma Adriaan A, Boellaard Ronald

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Research, VU University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 7057, 1081 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.013. Epub 2007 Feb 16.

Abstract

(R)-[11C]PK11195 has been used for quantifying cerebral microglial activation in vivo. In previous studies, both plasma input and reference tissue methods have been used, usually in combination with a region of interest (ROI) approach. Definition of ROIs, however, can be labourious and prone to interobserver variation. In addition, results are only obtained for predefined areas and (unexpected) signals in undefined areas may be missed. On the other hand, standard pharmacokinetic models are too sensitive to noise to calculate (R)-[11C]PK11195 binding on a voxel-by-voxel basis. Linearised versions of both plasma input and reference tissue models have been described, and these are more suitable for parametric imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of these plasma input and reference tissue parametric methods on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis of (R)-[11C]PK11195 binding. Dynamic (R)-[11C]PK11195 PET scans with arterial blood sampling were performed in 7 younger and 11 elderly healthy subjects. Parametric images of volume of distribution (Vd) and binding potential (BP) were generated using linearised versions of plasma input (Logan) and reference tissue (Reference Parametric Mapping) models. Images were compared at the group level using SPM with a two-sample t-test per voxel, both with and without proportional scaling. Parametric BP images without scaling provided the most sensitive framework for determining differences in (R)-[11C]PK11195 binding between younger and elderly subjects. Vd images could only demonstrate differences in (R)-[11C]PK11195 binding when analysed with proportional scaling due to intersubject variation in K1/k2 (blood-brain barrier transport and non-specific binding).

摘要

(R)-[11C]PK11195已被用于在体内定量脑小胶质细胞激活。在先前的研究中,血浆输入法和参考组织法都被使用过,通常与感兴趣区域(ROI)方法结合使用。然而,ROI的定义可能很繁琐,并且容易出现观察者间差异。此外,结果仅针对预定义区域获得,未定义区域中的(意外)信号可能会被遗漏。另一方面,标准药代动力学模型对噪声过于敏感,无法逐体素计算(R)-[11C]PK11195的结合。已经描述了血浆输入模型和参考组织模型的线性化版本,这些版本更适合于参数成像。本研究的目的是比较这些血浆输入和参考组织参数方法在(R)-[11C]PK11195结合的统计参数映射(SPM)分析结果上的性能。对7名年轻和11名老年健康受试者进行了动态(R)-[11C]PK11195正电子发射断层扫描(PET)并采集动脉血样。使用血浆输入(洛根)模型和参考组织(参考参数映射)模型的线性化版本生成分布容积(Vd)和结合潜能(BP)的参数图像。在组水平上使用SPM通过对每个体素进行双样本t检验来比较图像,检验时采用和不采用比例缩放。未进行缩放的参数BP图像为确定年轻和老年受试者之间(R)-[11C]PK11195结合的差异提供了最敏感的框架。由于K1/k2(血脑屏障转运和非特异性结合)在受试者之间存在差异,Vd图像只有在采用比例缩放进行分析时才能显示出(R)-[11C]PK11195结合的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验