Reiss Richard, Anderson Elizabeth L, Cross Carroll E, Hidy George, Hoel David, McClellan Roger, Moolgavkar Suresh
Exponent, Inc., Alexandria, Virginia 22314, USA.
Inhal Toxicol. 2007 May;19(5):419-49. doi: 10.1080/08958370601174941.
Ambient particulate matter (PM) is a complex mixture of inorganic and organic compounds. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates PM as a criteria pollutant and promulgates National Ambient Air Quality Standards for it. The PM indicator is based on mass concentration, unspecified as to chemical composition, for specific size fractions. The numerical standards are based on epidemiologic evidence of associations between the various size-related particle mass concentrations as indicators and excess mortality and cardiorespiratory health effects as endpoints. The U.S. National Research Council has stated that more research is needed to differentiate the apparent health effects associated with different particle chemical constituents. Sulfate and nitrate constitute a significant portion of the particle mass in the atmosphere, but are accompanied by similar amounts of carbonaceous material, along with low concentrations of various species, including bioactive organic compounds and redox cycling metals. Extensive animal and human toxicology data show no significant effects for particles consisting only of sulfate and nitrate compounds at levels in excess of ambient air concentrations. A few epidemiologic studies, including both short-term time-series studies and long-term cohort studies, have included the sulfate content of PM as a specific variable in health effect analyses. There are much less data for nitrate. The results from the epidemiologic studies with PM sulfate are inconsistent. A detailed analysis of the time-series epidemiological studies shows that PM sulfate has a weaker "risk factor" than PM2.5 for health effects. Since sulfate is correlated with PM2.5, this result is inconsistent with sulfate having a strong health influence. However, there are many limitations with these types of studies that warrant caution for any comparison between a chemical component and mass concentration. In total, the epidemiologic and toxicologic evidence provide little or no support for a causal association of PM sulfate and health risk at ambient concentrations. For nitrate-containing PM, virtually no epidemiological data exist. Limited toxicological evidence does not support a causal association between particulate nitrate compounds and excess health risks. There are some possible indirect processes through which sulfate and nitrate in PM may affect health-related endpoints, including interactions with certain metal species and a linkage with production of secondary organic matter. There is insufficient evidence to include or exclude these processes as being potentially important to PM-associated health risk.
环境颗粒物(PM)是无机和有机化合物的复杂混合物。美国环境保护署(EPA)将PM作为一种标准污染物进行监管,并颁布了相关的国家环境空气质量标准。PM指标基于特定粒径分数的质量浓度,未指定化学成分。数值标准基于各种与粒径相关的颗粒物质量浓度作为指标与超额死亡率和心肺健康影响作为终点之间关联的流行病学证据。美国国家研究委员会表示,需要更多研究来区分与不同颗粒化学成分相关的明显健康影响。硫酸盐和硝酸盐在大气颗粒物质量中占很大比例,但同时伴有相似数量的含碳物质,以及低浓度的各种物质,包括生物活性有机化合物和氧化还原循环金属。大量的动物和人体毒理学数据表明,仅由硫酸盐和硝酸盐化合物组成的颗粒物,在超过环境空气浓度的水平下,不会产生显著影响。一些流行病学研究,包括短期时间序列研究和长期队列研究,在健康影响分析中,将PM中的硫酸盐含量作为一个特定变量。关于硝酸盐的数据则少得多。关于PM硫酸盐的流行病学研究结果并不一致。对时间序列流行病学研究的详细分析表明,对于健康影响而言,PM硫酸盐作为“风险因素”的作用比PM2.5弱。由于硫酸盐与PM2.5相关,这一结果与硫酸盐具有强烈健康影响的观点不一致。然而,这类研究存在许多局限性,因此在比较化学成分和质量浓度时需谨慎。总体而言,流行病学和毒理学证据几乎没有支持在环境浓度下PM硫酸盐与健康风险之间存在因果关联。对于含硝酸盐的PM,几乎没有流行病学数据。有限的毒理学证据不支持颗粒硝酸盐化合物与超额健康风险之间存在因果关联。PM中的硫酸盐和硝酸盐可能通过一些间接过程影响与健康相关的终点,包括与某些金属物种的相互作用以及与二次有机物质产生的联系。但没有足够的证据来确定这些过程对与PM相关的健康风险是否潜在重要。