Suppr超能文献

三种疾病特异性生活质量问卷(布里斯托尔女性下尿路症状问卷、尿失禁生活质量问卷和国王健康问卷)在压力性尿失禁女性中的比较。

Comparison of three disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaires (Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Incontinence Quality of Life and King's Health Questionnaire) in women with stress urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Oh Seung-June, Ku Ja Hyeon

机构信息

Departments of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(1):66-71. doi: 10.1080/00365590600917487.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of stress urinary incontinence (UI) on quality of life (QOL) using three disease-specific QOL instruments and compare the results obtained with these instruments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 28 women (age range 36-74 years) with stress UI were included in the study. To obtain QOL assessments, patients were asked to complete the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (BFLUTS), Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QoL) and King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) instruments.

RESULTS

One domain in the BFLUTS (Incontinence symptoms) and one in the KHQ (Severity measures) correlated inversely with the Valsalva leak point pressure and the cough leak point pressure, respectively; however, other domains in the three questionnaires did not correlate with objective data. Two BFLUTS domains (Incontinence symptoms and QOL) correlated weakly or moderately with six KHQ domains; however, other BFLUTS domains did not correlate with most KHQ domains. Significant negative correlations were noted between two BFLUTS domains (Incontinence symptoms and QOL) and most I-QoL domains; however, other BFLUTS domains did not correlate with the I-QoL. Role limitations, Emotional problems and Severity measures in the KHQ correlated weakly or moderately with the I-QoL; however, General health and Personal relationships did not correlate significantly with the I-QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective QOL results of stress UI using condition-specific QOL questionnaires may differ because there are a plethora of measurement instruments that vary in terms of their scope and content. Our findings suggest that, before deciding on an instrument, its contents should be thoroughly reviewed to ensure that a particular aspect of QOL does not need additional assessment.

摘要

目的

使用三种特定疾病的生活质量工具,研究压力性尿失禁(UI)对生活质量(QOL)的影响,并比较这些工具所获得的结果。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入28名患有压力性尿失禁的女性(年龄范围36 - 74岁)。为了获得生活质量评估结果,要求患者完成布里斯托尔女性下尿路症状(BFLUTS)、尿失禁生活质量(I-QoL)和国王健康问卷(KHQ)工具。

结果

BFLUTS中的一个领域(失禁症状)和KHQ中的一个领域(严重程度测量)分别与瓦尔萨尔瓦漏尿点压力和咳嗽漏尿点压力呈负相关;然而,三份问卷中的其他领域与客观数据无相关性。BFLUTS的两个领域(失禁症状和生活质量)与KHQ的六个领域呈弱或中度相关;然而,BFLUTS的其他领域与大多数KHQ领域无相关性。BFLUTS的两个领域(失禁症状和生活质量)与大多数I-QoL领域之间存在显著负相关;然而,BFLUTS的其他领域与I-QoL无相关性。KHQ中的角色限制、情感问题和严重程度测量与I-QoL呈弱或中度相关;然而,总体健康和人际关系与I-QoL无显著相关性。

结论

使用特定疾病的生活质量问卷对压力性尿失禁的主观生活质量结果可能存在差异,因为有大量测量工具,其范围和内容各不相同。我们的研究结果表明,在决定使用一种工具之前,应彻底审查其内容,以确保生活质量的某个特定方面不需要额外评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验