Altuntas Fevzi, Kocyigit Ismail, Ozturk Ahmet, Kaynar Leylagul, Sari Ismail, Oztekin Mehmet, Solmaz Musa, Eser Bulent, Cetin Mustafa, Unal Ali
Erciyes Medical School, Department of Hematology and Apheresis Unit, Kayseri 38039, Turkey.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2007 Apr;36(2):159-67. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2006.10.008. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are commonly used as a stem cell source for autologous transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate blood cell separators with respect to separation results and content of the harvest. Forty autologous PBPC collections in patients with hematological malignancies were performed with either the Amicus or the COM.TEC cell separators. The median product volume was lower with the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC (125 mL vs. 300 mL; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median number of CD34+ cell/kg in product between the Amicus and the COM.TEC (3.0 x 10(6) vs. 4.1 x 10(6); p = 0.129). There was a statistically higher mean volume of ACD used in collections on the Amicus compared to the COM.TEC (1040 +/- 241 mL vs. 868 +/- 176 mL; p = 0.019). There was a statistical difference in platelet (PLT) contamination of the products between the Amicus and the COM.TEC (0.3 x 10(11) vs. 1.1 x 10(11); p < 0.001). The median % decrease in PB PLT count was statistically higher in the COM.TEC compared to the Amicus instruments (18.5% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.028). In conclusion, both instruments collected PBPCs efficiently. However, Amicus has the advantage of lower PLT contamination in the product, and less decrease in PB platelet count with lower product volume in autologous setting.
外周血祖细胞(PBPC)通常用作自体移植的干细胞来源。本研究旨在评估血细胞分离机的分离效果和采集物的成分。对40例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者进行了自体PBPC采集,分别使用了Amicus或COM.TEC血细胞分离机。与COM.TEC相比,Amicus采集的产品中位体积更低(125 mL对300 mL;p < 0.001)。Amicus和COM.TEC采集的产品中,每千克CD34+细胞的中位数无统计学显著差异(3.0×10⁶对4.1×10⁶;p = 0.129)。与COM.TEC相比,使用Amicus采集时,平均使用的ACD体积在统计学上更高(1040±241 mL对868±176 mL;p = 0.019)。Amicus和COM.TEC采集的产品在血小板(PLT)污染方面存在统计学差异(0.3×10¹¹对1.1×10¹¹;p < 0.001)。与Amicus仪器相比,COM.TEC采集时外周血PLT计数的中位数下降百分比在统计学上更高(18.5%对9.5%;p = 0.028)。总之,两种仪器都能有效地采集PBPC。然而,在自体情况下,Amicus具有产品中PLT污染更低、产品体积更小且外周血血小板计数下降更少的优势。