Suppr超能文献

传统体层摄影术在声门癌评估中仍有一席之地吗?

Does conventional tomography still have a place in glottic cancer evaluation?

作者信息

Ali Y A, Saleh E M, Mancuso A A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Assiut University Medical School, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 1992 Feb;45(2):114-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)80066-2.

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) can detect laryngeal cancer invading the pre-epiglottic, paraglottic spaces, laryngeal cartilages, and soft tissues, but in T1 and limited T2 tumours its main value is in evaluating subglottic extent. Conventional tomography in the coronal plane has been used with reasonable success to detect both subglottic and ventricular invasion and is less expensive than CT. Twenty-nine cases of glottic carcinoma of all stages were examined clinically, endoscopically and radiographically by both coronal conventional tomography and CT. The results of these imaging studies are compared in this investigation, stressing their relationship to clinical findings (and stage), especially vocal and cord mobility. Coronal conventional tomography was found to be as accurate as CT for sublottic spread in nine cases of T1 and T2A cancer with normal vocal cord mobility. Conventional tomography had a slight tendency to overestimate ventricular and false cord involvement (two out of seven patients) with T1 glottic cancer. When mobility was impaired (four cases) or absent (15 cases), CT added data which changed staging and/or treatment plan in six cases. In seven others it was suggestive of a more advanced stage.

摘要

计算机断层扫描(CT)能够检测出侵犯会厌前间隙、声门旁间隙、喉软骨及软组织的喉癌,但对于T1期和局限性T2期肿瘤,其主要价值在于评估声门下范围。冠状面传统断层扫描在检测声门下及室带侵犯方面取得了一定成功,且费用低于CT。对29例各期声门癌患者进行了临床、内镜及影像学检查,检查方法包括冠状面传统断层扫描和CT。本研究对这些影像学检查结果进行了比较,重点关注它们与临床发现(及分期)的关系,尤其是声带及声带动度。结果发现,对于9例声带动度正常的T1期和T2A期癌症患者,冠状面传统断层扫描在检测声门下扩散方面与CT一样准确。对于T1期声门癌,传统断层扫描有轻微高估室带及假声带受累的倾向(7例患者中有2例)。当声带动度受损(4例)或消失(15例)时,CT提供的数据改变了6例患者的分期和/或治疗方案。在另外7例患者中,CT提示肿瘤分期更晚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验