Suppr超能文献

对接受颈部疼痛物理治疗干预的患者基于治疗的分类系统的初步检查。

Preliminary examination of a proposed treatment-based classification system for patients receiving physical therapy interventions for neck pain.

作者信息

Fritz Julie M, Brennan Gerard P

机构信息

Division of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2007 May;87(5):513-24. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060192. Epub 2007 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neck pain frequently is managed by physical therapists. The development of classification methods for matching interventions to subgroups of patients may improve clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe a proposed classification system for patients with neck pain by examining data for consecutive patients receiving physical therapy interventions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Standardized methods for collecting baseline and intervention data were used for all patients receiving physical therapy interventions for neck pain over 1 year. Outcome variables were the Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric pain rating, and number of visits. Treatment was provided at the discretion of the physical therapist. After the completion of treatment, each patient was classified by use of baseline variables. The interventions received by the patient were categorized as being matched or not matched to the classification. Outcomes for patients who received matched interventions were compared with those for patients who received nonmatched interventions. The interrater reliability of the classification algorithm was examined with a subset of 50 patients.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients were included in this study (74% women; age [X+/-SD]=44.4+/-16.0 years). The most common classification was centralization (34.7%); next were exercise and conditioning (32.8%) and mobility (17.5%). The interrater reliability for classification decisions was high (kappa=.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.87-1.0). A total of 113 patients (41.2%) received interventions matched to the classification. Receiving matched interventions was associated with greater improvements in the NDI (mean difference=5.6 points, 95% CI=2.6-8.6) and in pain ratings (mean difference=0.74 point, 95% CI=0.21-1.3) than receiving nonmatched interventions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The development of classification methods for patients with neck pain may improve the outcomes of physical therapy intervention. This study was done to examine a previously proposed classification system for patients receiving physical therapy interventions for neck pain. Receiving interventions matched to the classification system was associated with better outcomes than receiving nonmatched interventions. Although the design of this study prohibited drawing conclusions about the effectiveness of the system, the results suggest that further research on the system may be warranted.

摘要

背景与目的

颈部疼痛常由物理治疗师进行处理。开发将干预措施与患者亚组相匹配的分类方法可能会改善临床疗效。本研究的目的是通过检查接受物理治疗干预的连续患者的数据,描述一种针对颈部疼痛患者的拟议分类系统。

对象与方法

对于接受为期1年颈部疼痛物理治疗干预的所有患者,采用标准化方法收集基线和干预数据。结局变量为颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、数字疼痛评分及就诊次数。治疗由物理治疗师酌情提供。治疗结束后,根据基线变量对每位患者进行分类。将患者接受的干预措施分类为与该分类匹配或不匹配。比较接受匹配干预措施的患者与接受不匹配干预措施的患者的结局。使用50名患者的子集检查分类算法的评分者间信度。

结果

本研究共纳入274例患者(74%为女性;年龄[X±标准差]=44.4±16.0岁)。最常见的分类是症状集中化(34.7%);其次是运动与体能训练(32.8%)和活动度(17.5%)。分类决策的评分者间信度较高(kappa=0.95,95%置信区间[CI]=0.87 - 1.0)。共有113例患者(41.2%)接受了与分类匹配的干预措施。与接受不匹配干预措施相比,接受匹配干预措施与NDI的更大改善(平均差异=5.6分,95% CI=2.6 - 8.6)和疼痛评分的更大改善(平均差异=0.74分,95% CI=0.21 - 1.3)相关。

讨论与结论

颈部疼痛患者分类方法的开发可能会改善物理治疗干预的疗效。本研究旨在检查一种先前针对接受颈部疼痛物理治疗干预患者提出的分类系统。与接受不匹配干预措施相比,接受与分类系统匹配的干预措施与更好的结局相关。尽管本研究的设计禁止就该系统的有效性得出结论,但结果表明可能有必要对该系统进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验