Dumont Monica L, Berry Mark R, Nickerson Beverly
Pfizer Global Research and Development, Analytical Research and Development Department, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007 May 9;44(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.01.047. Epub 2007 Feb 3.
During development of solid dosage products, a pharmaceutical manufacturer is typically required to propose dissolution acceptance criteria unless the product falls into Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class I, in which case a disintegration test may be used. At the time of filing the new drug application (NDA) or common technical document (CTD), the manufacturer has already met with regulatory agencies to discuss and refine dissolution strategy. The dissolution acceptance criteria are based on stability and batch history data and are often arrived at by considering the percentage of batches that pass United States Pharmacopeia (USP) criteria at Stage 1 (S(1)), when in fact, the product is deemed unacceptable only when a batch fails USP criteria at Stage 3 (S(3)) [H. Saranadasa, Disso. Technol. 7 (2000) 6-7, 18 [1]]. Calculating the probability of passing (or failing) dissolution criteria at S(1), S(2), or S(3) can assist a manufacturer in determining appropriate acceptance criteria. This article discusses a general statistical method that was developed to assess the probability of passing the multistage USP test for dissolution and how it was applied to an immediate release tablet formulation. In this case, acceptance criteria were set and the analysis was conducted to assess the probabilities of passing or failing based on this acceptance criterion. Whether the acceptance criteria were relevant to the product was also considered. This mathematical approach uses a Monte Carlo simulation and considers a range of values for standard deviation and mean of historical data.
在固体剂型产品的研发过程中,制药商通常需要提出溶出度验收标准,除非该产品属于生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)的第I类,在这种情况下可采用崩解试验。在提交新药申请(NDA)或通用技术文档(CTD)时,制造商已经与监管机构会面,讨论并完善溶出度策略。溶出度验收标准基于稳定性和批次历史数据,通常是通过考虑在第1阶段(S(1))符合美国药典(USP)标准的批次百分比来确定的,而实际上,只有当一个批次在第3阶段(S(3))不符合USP标准时,该产品才被视为不合格[H. Saranadasa,《溶出技术》7(2000)6 - 7,18 [1]]。计算在S(1)、S(2)或S(3)阶段通过(或未通过)溶出度标准的概率,有助于制造商确定合适的验收标准。本文讨论了一种通用的统计方法,该方法用于评估通过多阶段USP溶出度试验的概率,以及它如何应用于速释片剂配方。在这种情况下,设定了验收标准,并进行分析以评估基于该验收标准通过或未通过的概率。还考虑了验收标准是否与产品相关。这种数学方法使用蒙特卡罗模拟,并考虑历史数据的标准差和均值的一系列值。