Okolo Cynthia M, Ferretti Ralph P, MacArthur Charles A
Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2007 Mar-Apr;40(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400020601.
In this study, we examined the nature of whole-class discussion and teachers' instruction during discussion about historical topics in one inclusive, middle-grade classroom. We videotaped and analyzed 4 lessons to determine the nature of discussion sequences, rates of participation, and instructional challenges encountered by the teacher and students. We triangulated our analysis of observational data with teacher interviews. The results showed high rates of student participation, with no differences between students with and without disabilities. The teacher initiated and controlled the discussion, and nearly all student responses were from teacher to student rather than from student to student. The teacher encountered three challenges in developing students' understanding, and we identify specific practices she used to address these challenges. Based on students' response to measures administered by project staff and on their scores on statewide tests, this teacher's practices seemed to be highly effective.
在本研究中,我们考察了一个全纳性初中课堂中关于历史话题的全班讨论的性质以及教师在讨论过程中的指导情况。我们录制并分析了4节课,以确定讨论环节的性质、参与率以及教师和学生遇到的教学挑战。我们将观察数据的分析与教师访谈相结合进行三角互证。结果显示学生参与率很高,残疾学生和非残疾学生之间没有差异。教师发起并控制讨论,几乎所有学生的回答都是师生之间的,而非学生之间的。教师在培养学生理解能力方面遇到了三个挑战,我们确定了她用来应对这些挑战的具体做法。根据学生对项目工作人员所实施测评的反应以及他们在全州测试中的成绩,这位教师的做法似乎非常有效。