达比加群酯与重组人促红细胞生成素在危重症贫血管理中的比较。

Comparison of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the management of anemia of critical illness.

作者信息

Voils Stacy A, Harpe Spencer H, Brophy Gretchen M

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0533, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Apr;27(4):535-41. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.4.535.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa with epoetin alfa (recombinant human erythropoietin [rHuEPO]) for achieving transfusion independence and increasing hemoglobin concentrations in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective, descriptive study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two patients who spent at least 3 days in the cardio-thoracic, medical, or surgery-trauma intensive care units and received at least one weekly dose of rHuEPO 40,000 units (33 patients) or darbepoetin alfa 100 microg (39 patients).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Number of rHuEPO and darbepoetin alfa doses, hemoglobin concentrations, and cumulative number of transfusions were recorded for up to 28 days after the first dose was given, and the data were statistically analyzed. Beginning a median of 10 days after the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, they received a median of 3.5 doses of darbepoetin alfa or 4 doses of rHuEPO. Mean hemoglobin concentrations at which treatment with darbepoetin alfa and rHuEPO were started were 8 and 8.2 g/dl, respectively (p=0.41). Transfusion independence was achieved in 44% of patients in the darbepoetin alfa group compared with 36% of patients in the rHuEPO group (p=0.63). Patients in both groups received a mean of 2.7 units of packed red blood cells during the 28-day study period. The mean change in hemoglobin levels from baseline over time did not significantly differ between groups (p=0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa 100 microg/week and those receiving rHuEPO 40,000 units/week for anemia of critical illness achieved similar rates of transfusion independence and increases in hemoglobin concentrations from baseline at 28 days. Compared with previously published studies, erythropoietic agents were administered late in the course of critical illness in response to low hemoglobin concentrations.

摘要

研究目的

比较达比泊汀α与促红细胞生成素α(重组人促红细胞生成素[rHuEPO])在使重症患者实现输血独立及提高血红蛋白浓度方面的有效性。

设计

回顾性描述性研究。

地点

一级创伤中心重症监护病房。

患者

72名在心胸、内科或外科创伤重症监护病房至少住院3天且每周至少接受一剂40000单位rHuEPO(33例患者)或100微克达比泊汀α(39例患者)的患者。

测量指标及主要结果

记录首次给药后长达28天内rHuEPO和达比泊汀α的给药剂量、血红蛋白浓度及累计输血量,并对数据进行统计学分析。患者入住重症监护病房后中位数10天开始给药,接受达比泊汀α的中位数剂量为3.5剂,rHuEPO为4剂。开始使用达比泊汀α和rHuEPO治疗时的平均血红蛋白浓度分别为8和8.2 g/dl(p = 0.41)。达比泊汀α组44%的患者实现了输血独立,rHuEPO组为36%(p = 0.63)。两组患者在28天研究期间平均接受了2.7单位的浓缩红细胞。两组间血红蛋白水平相对于基线随时间的平均变化无显著差异(p = 0.75)。

结论

每周接受100微克达比泊汀α和每周接受40000单位rHuEPO治疗重症疾病贫血患者,在28天时实现输血独立的比例及血红蛋白浓度相对于基线的升高幅度相似。与先前发表的研究相比,促红细胞生成剂是在重症疾病病程后期因血红蛋白浓度低而使用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索