Clouse W Darrin, Rasmussen Todd E, Peck Michael A, Eliason Jonathan L, Cox Mitchell W, Bowser Andrew N, Jenkins Donald H, Smith David L, Rich Norman M
332nd Expeditionary Medical Group, Air Force Theater Hospital, Balad Air Base, Iraq.
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.040.
Wartime vascular injury management has traditionally advanced vascular surgery. Despite past military experience, and recent civilian publications, there are no reports detailing current in-theater treatment. The objective of this analysis is to describe the management of vascular injury at the central echelon III surgical facility in Iraq, and to place this experience in perspective with past conflicts.
Vascular injuries evaluated at our facility between September 1, 2004 and August 31, 2006 were prospectively entered into a registry and reviewed.
During this 24-month period, 6,801 battle-related casualties were assessed. Three hundred twenty-four (4.8%) were diagnosed with 347 vascular injuries. Extremity injuries accounted for 260 (74.9%). Vascular injuries in the neck (n = 56; 16.1%) and thoracoabdominal domain (n = 31; 8.9%) were less common. US forces accounted for 149 casualties (46%), 97 (30%) were local civilian, and 78 (24%) were Iraqi forces. One hundred seven (33%) patients with vascular injury were evacuated from forward locations after treatment initiation. Fifty-four (50%) of these had temporary shunts placed. Of 43 proximal shunts placed in-field, 37 (86%) were patent at the time of our assessment. Early amputation rate was 6.6% for those extremity injuries treated for limb salvage. Perioperative mortality was 4.3%.
This evaluation represents the first in-theater report of wartime vascular injury since Vietnam. Extremity injuries continue to predominate, although the incidence of vascular injury appears to be somewhat increased. Local forces and civilians now represent a substantial proportion of those injured. The principles of rapid evacuation, temporary shunting, and early reconstruction are effective, with satisfactory early in-theater limb salvage.
战时血管损伤的处理一直推动着血管外科的发展。尽管有过去的军事经验以及近期的民用文献报道,但尚无详细阐述当前战地治疗情况的报告。本分析的目的是描述伊拉克中央三级外科机构对血管损伤的处理,并将这一经验与过去的冲突情况进行对比。
对2004年9月1日至2006年8月31日期间在我们机构评估的血管损伤进行前瞻性登记和回顾。
在这24个月期间,共评估了6801例与战斗相关的伤亡人员。其中324例(4.8%)被诊断为347处血管损伤。四肢损伤占260例(74.9%)。颈部血管损伤(n = 56;16.1%)和胸腹区域血管损伤(n = 31;8.9%)相对较少见。美军伤亡人员149例(46%),当地平民97例(30%),伊拉克军队78例(24%)。107例(33%)血管损伤患者在开始治疗后从前线撤离。其中54例(50%)放置了临时分流管。在现场放置的43根近端分流管中,在我们评估时37根(86%)保持通畅。为挽救肢体而治疗的四肢损伤患者早期截肢率为6.6%。围手术期死亡率为4.3%。
本评估是自越南战争以来首份关于战时血管损伤的战地报告。尽管血管损伤的发生率似乎有所上升,但四肢损伤仍然占主导地位。当地部队和平民现在在受伤人员中占相当大的比例。快速撤离、临时分流和早期重建的原则是有效的,战地早期肢体挽救效果令人满意。