Pizarro C, Pérez-del-Notario N, González-Sáiz J M
Department of Chemistry, University of La Rioja, C/Madre de Dios 51, 26006 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
J Chromatogr A. 2007 May 18;1149(2):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.055. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
This study presents a method based on the use of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) for the quantitative analysis of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA), 2,3,4,6-tetrachloroanisole (TeCA), pentachloroanisole (PCA), 2,4,6-tribromoanisole (TBA), 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP), 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol (TeCP), pentachlorophenol (PCP) and 2,4,6-tribromophenol (TBP) in cork stoppers. The influential parameters of the MAE procedure (extraction time, temperature and solvent volume) were optimised using a central composite experimental design combined with desirability functions. The optimal conditions identified were temperature 170 degrees C, solvent volume 35 mL and extraction time 90 min. MAE extracts were concentrated and derivatised prior to separation and quantification by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. To evaluate the applicability of the proposed MAE method, recovery results were compared with those obtained with the Soxhlet extraction method; the results were similar with both extraction methods. The new method was also satisfactorily applied to real cork stopper samples.
本研究提出了一种基于微波辅助萃取(MAE)的方法,用于定量分析软木塞中的2,4,6-三氯苯甲醚(TCA)、2,3,4,6-四氯苯甲醚(TeCA)、五氯苯甲醚(PCA)、2,4,6-三溴苯甲醚(TBA)、2,4,6-三氯苯酚(TCP)、2,3,4,6-四氯苯酚(TeCP)、五氯苯酚(PCP)和2,4,6-三溴苯酚(TBP)。采用中心复合实验设计结合期望函数对MAE程序的影响参数(萃取时间、温度和溶剂量)进行了优化。确定的最佳条件为温度170℃、溶剂量35 mL和萃取时间90分钟。MAE提取物在通过带有电子捕获检测的气相色谱进行分离和定量之前进行浓缩和衍生化。为了评估所提出的MAE方法的适用性,将回收率结果与索氏提取法获得的结果进行了比较;两种提取方法的结果相似。该新方法也令人满意地应用于实际软木塞样品。