Mackenzie F J, Jordens C F C, Ankeny R A, McPhee J, Kerridge I H
Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2007 Apr;37(4):224-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01298.x.
Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicines (DTCA-PM) is currently banned in Australia. DTCA-PM is thought to increase health-care costs by increasing demand for drugs that are both expensive and potentially harmful. However, DTCA-PM is occurring in Australia despite the current prohibition. We argue that successful regulation of the practice has been undermined as a result of changes brought about by the ongoing communications revolution, the increasing centrality of patient choice in medical decision-making and the impossibility of drawing and maintaining a sharp distinction between information and advertising. The prohibition is further threatened by recent international trade agreements. These factors make DTCA-PM inevitable and legislative and professional bodies need to acknowledge this to create a more effective health-care policy.
在澳大利亚,处方药的直接面向消费者的广告(DTCA-PM)目前被禁止。人们认为,DTCA-PM通过增加对既昂贵又有潜在危害的药物的需求,从而增加了医疗保健成本。然而,尽管目前有禁令,DTCA-PM在澳大利亚仍在出现。我们认为,由于持续的通信革命带来的变化、患者选择在医疗决策中日益重要以及无法清晰区分信息和广告并维持这种区分,对这种做法的成功监管受到了破坏。最近的国际贸易协定进一步威胁到了这项禁令。这些因素使得DTCA-PM不可避免,立法机构和专业团体需要认识到这一点,以制定更有效的医疗保健政策。