Guilin Yu, Nan Li, Yousheng Li, Yining Wang
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Mar;97(3):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.01.005.
Different types of investments affect the formation of the alpha-case (alpha-case) layer on titanium castings. This alpha-case layer may possibly alter the mechanical properties of cast titanium, which may influence the fabrication of removable and fixed prostheses. The formation mechanism for the alpha-case layer is not clear.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 3 types of investments on the microstructure, composition, and microhardness of the alpha-case layer on titanium castings.
Fifteen wax columns with a diameter of 5 mm and a length of 40 mm were divided into 3 groups of 5 patterns each. Patterns were invested using 3 types of investment materials, respectively, and were cast in pure titanium. The 3 types of materials tested were SiO(2)-, Al(2)O(3)-, and MgO-based investments. All specimens were sectioned and prepared for metallographic observation. The microstructure and composition of the surface reaction layer of titanium castings were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The surface microhardness (VHN) for all specimens was measured using a hardness testing machine, and a mean value for each group was calculated.
The alpha-case layer on titanium castings invested with SiO(2)-, Al(2)O(3)-, and MgO-based investments consisted of 3 layers-namely, the oxide layer, alloy layer, and hardening layer. In this study, the oxide layer and alloy layer were called the reaction layer. The thickness of the reaction layer for titanium castings using SiO(2)-, Al(2)O(3)-, and MgO-based investments was approximately 80 microm, 50 microm, and 14 microm, respectively. The surface microhardness of titanium castings made with SiO(2)-based investments was the highest, and that with MgO-based investments was the lowest.
The type of investment affects the microstructure and microhardness of the alpha-case layer of titanium castings. Based on the thickness of the surface reaction layer and the surface microhardness of titanium castings, MgO-based investment materials may be the best choice for casting these materials.
不同类型的包埋材料会影响钛铸件上α相层(α相层)的形成。这种α相层可能会改变铸造钛的力学性能,进而可能影响可摘局部义齿和固定义齿的制作。α相层的形成机制尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是评估3种包埋材料对钛铸件上α相层的微观结构、成分和显微硬度的影响。
将15根直径5mm、长度40mm的蜡柱分成3组,每组5个铸型。分别使用3种包埋材料对铸型进行包埋,并采用纯钛进行铸造。所测试的3种材料为基于SiO₂、Al₂O₃和MgO的包埋材料。将所有标本切片并制备用于金相观察。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和电子探针微分析(EPMA)研究钛铸件表面反应层的微观结构和成分。使用硬度测试机测量所有标本的表面显微硬度(VHN),并计算每组的平均值。
采用基于SiO₂、Al₂O₃和MgO的包埋材料铸造的钛铸件上的α相层由三层组成,即氧化层、合金层和硬化层。在本研究中,氧化层和合金层被称为反应层。使用基于SiO₂、Al₂O₃和MgO的包埋材料铸造的钛铸件的反应层厚度分别约为80微米、50微米和14微米。基于SiO₂的包埋材料铸造的钛铸件表面显微硬度最高,而基于MgO的包埋材料铸造的钛铸件表面显微硬度最低。
包埋材料的类型会影响钛铸件α相层的微观结构和显微硬度。基于钛铸件表面反应层的厚度和表面显微硬度,基于MgO的包埋材料可能是铸造这些材料的最佳选择。