Li Chunyu, Friedman Bruce, Conwell Yeates, Fiscella Kevin
Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Apr;55(4):596-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01103.x.
To determine the performance of the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (PHQ-2) against the criterion standard for diagnosing major depression, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), and to examine its performance across age, sex, and racial/ethnic groups.
Cross-sectional observational study.
The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) (2001/02), a nationally representative survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. household population.
The 8,205 adults aged 65 and older who participated in NESARC.
The PHQ-2's criterion validity (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) against the DSM-IV) and construct validity (Spearman correlations between the PHQ-2 and the six scales of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Questionnaire (SF-12)) were calculated.
The PHQ-2's criterion validity for major depression was good (sensitivity=100%, specificity=77%, AUC=0.88). Its sensitivity was 100% for each subgroup. Specificity increased with age, was higher for men than for women, and differed across racial and ethnic groups. For the total sample and each sex, all six SF-12 scales were significantly lower in people who tested positive using the PHQ-2. For each age and racial or ethnic group, most of the six scales differed significantly between those who tested positive and tested negative.
The PHQ-2 is a valid screening tool for major depression in older people but should be followed by a more-comprehensive diagnostic process. Although its specificity differs by age, sex, and racial and ethnic groups, these differences appear to be of little clinical significance.
确定患者健康问卷2(PHQ - 2)相对于诊断重度抑郁症的标准参照标准《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)的性能,并考察其在不同年龄、性别和种族/族裔群体中的性能。
横断面观察性研究。
酒精及相关疾病国家流行病学调查(NESARC)(2001/02),一项针对美国非机构化家庭人口的具有全国代表性的调查。
参与NESARC的8205名65岁及以上的成年人。
计算PHQ - 2的标准效度(相对于DSM - IV的敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC))以及结构效度(PHQ - 2与医学结局研究12项简短问卷(SF - 12)的六个量表之间的斯皮尔曼相关性)。
PHQ - 2对重度抑郁症的标准效度良好(敏感性 = 100%,特异性 = 77%,AUC = 0.88)。其在每个亚组中的敏感性均为100%。特异性随年龄增加,男性高于女性,且在不同种族和族裔群体中存在差异。对于总样本和各性别,使用PHQ - 2检测呈阳性的人群中,SF - 12的所有六个量表均显著更低。对于每个年龄以及种族或族裔群体,六个量表中的大多数在检测呈阳性和呈阴性的人群之间存在显著差异。
PHQ - 2是老年人重度抑郁症的有效筛查工具,但后续应进行更全面的诊断过程。尽管其特异性因年龄、性别以及种族和族裔群体而异,但这些差异似乎临床意义不大。