Csikai J, Dóczi R
Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Debrecen, Pf. 105, 4010 Debrecen-10, Hungary.
Appl Radiat Isot. 2007 Jul;65(7):764-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.01.020. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
The advantages and limitations of the slowing down of epithermal neutrons and the thermal neutron reflection methods were compared for bulk hydrogen analysis. In both cases, the same sample dimensions were used, i.e. 10cm diameter and 8cm height. It was found that the sensitivity of the slowing down method is higher by a factor of approximately 20 in average and the matrix effect can be neglected as compared to the neutron reflection technique. The simultaneous application of the two methods renders the determination of the H content and the C/H atomic ratio possible. The effect of spatial distribution of hydrogen in the matrix to be investigated on the number of reflected neutrons was also studied.
为进行大量氢分析,比较了超热中子慢化法和热中子反射法的优缺点。在这两种情况下,使用相同的样品尺寸,即直径10厘米、高8厘米。结果发现,慢化法的灵敏度平均高约20倍,与中子反射技术相比,基体效应可忽略不计。同时应用这两种方法可确定氢含量和碳/氢原子比。还研究了待研究基体中氢的空间分布对反射中子数的影响。