Bermúdez-Pirela Valmore J, Cano Clímaco, Medina Mayerlim T, Souki Aida, Lemus Miguel A, Leal Elliuz M, Seyfi Hamid A, Cano Raquel, Ciscek Ana, Bermúdez-Arias Fernando, Contreras Freddy, Israili Zafar H, Hernández-Hernández Rafael, Valasco Manuel
Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Research Center Dr. Félix Gómez, University of Zulia School of Medicine, Maracaibo, Venezuela.
Am J Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):194-202. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000249909.54047.0e.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin resistance and defects in insulin secretion from pancreatic beta-cells, which have been studied by using euglycemic/hyperinsulinemic clamps. However, it is difficult to study insulin resistance and beta-cell failure by these techniques in humans. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different antidiabetic therapeutic regimens on insulin resistance and beta-cell activity by using a mathematical model, Homeostasis Model Assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA(IR)) and beta-cell function (HOMA(beta-cell)).
Seventy type 2 diabetic patients were randomly assigned to one of three therapeutic regimens: (A) metformin + American Diabetic Association (ADA)-recommended diet + physical activity; (B) metformin + low-dose glimepiride + ADA diet + physical activity; or (C) ADA diet + physical activity (no drugs). Blood samples were obtained before and after the treatment to determine serum levels of fasting and post-prandial blood glucose, fasting insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and HOMA(IR) and HOMA(beta-cell) were calculated.
Fasting and post-prandial levels of glucose, HbA1c, and fasting insulin and calculated HOMA(IR) and HOMA(beta-cell) values before treatment were significantly higher than the respective values after treatment for all groups of patients (P < 0.01). Significant differences were also found when comparing the treatment-induced reduction in fasting blood glucose (51.8%; P < 0.01), post-prandial blood glucose (55.0%; P < 0.05), and HOMA(IR) (65.3%; P < 0.01) in patients of Group B with that in patients receiving other therapeutic options (Groups A and C).
Metformin plus low-dose glimepiride (plus ADA diet and physical activity) is a more effective treatment for type 2 diabetes than either metformin plus ADA diet and physical activity or ADA diet and physical activity alone. Determination of HOMA(IR) and HOMA(beta-cell) values is an inexpensive, reliable, less invasive, and less labor-intensive method than other tests to estimate insulin resistance and beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
2型糖尿病的特征是胰岛素抵抗和胰岛β细胞胰岛素分泌缺陷,对此已通过正常血糖/高胰岛素钳夹技术进行了研究。然而,利用这些技术在人体中研究胰岛素抵抗和β细胞功能障碍存在困难。因此,本研究的目的是通过使用数学模型、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA(IR))和β细胞功能(HOMA(β细胞))来评估三种不同的抗糖尿病治疗方案对胰岛素抵抗和β细胞活性的影响。
70例2型糖尿病患者被随机分配至三种治疗方案之一:(A)二甲双胍+美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐饮食+体育活动;(B)二甲双胍+小剂量格列美脲+ADA饮食+体育活动;或(C)ADA饮食+体育活动(不使用药物)。在治疗前后采集血样,以测定空腹和餐后血糖、空腹胰岛素以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的血清水平,并计算HOMA(IR)和HOMA(β细胞)。
所有患者组治疗前的空腹和餐后血糖水平、HbA1c、空腹胰岛素以及计算得出的HOMA(IR)和HOMA(β细胞)值均显著高于治疗后的相应值(P<0.01)。在比较B组患者与接受其他治疗方案(A组和C组)的患者治疗后空腹血糖降低幅度(51.8%;P<0.01)、餐后血糖降低幅度(55.0%;P<0.05)以及HOMA(IR)降低幅度(65.3%;P<0.01)时,也发现了显著差异。
二甲双胍加小剂量格列美脲(加ADA饮食和体育活动)治疗2型糖尿病比单独使用二甲双胍加ADA饮食和体育活动或单独使用ADA饮食和体育活动更有效。与其他检测方法相比,测定HOMA(IR)和HOMA(β细胞)值是一种用于评估2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗和β细胞功能的廉价、可靠、侵入性较小且劳动强度较低的方法。