• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿扎那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦之间有益的药代动力学相互作用。

Beneficial pharmacokinetic interaction between atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.

作者信息

Pham Paul A, Flexner Charles, Parsons Teresa, Vasist Lakshmi, Fuchs Edward, Carson Kathryn, Agarwala Sangeeta, Barditch-Crovo Patricia

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Jun 1;45(2):201-5. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318050d632.

DOI:10.1097/QAI.0b013e318050d632
PMID:17414932
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The combination of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir (ATV) with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors has been used as a salvage regimen in HIV-infected patients. Because these agents, to various degrees, are substrates, inducers, and inhibitors of CYP450 3A4, there is concern for alterations in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of these combined agents.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the steady-state PK interactions between ATV, ritonavir (RTV), and LPV when coadministered at various doses.

METHODS

HIV-negative subjects (n = 15) received a combination of ATV, RTV, and LPV in the following sequence: period I (days 1-10), ATV/r at a dose of 300/100 mg once daily; period II (days 11-24), ATV at a dose of 300 mg once daily plus LPV/r at a dose of 400/100 mg twice daily; and period III (days 25-34), ATV/r at a dose of 300/100 mg once daily plus LPV/r at a dose of 400/100 mg twice daily. Intensive PK analysis was performed on days 10, 24, and 34. A paired t test was used for pairwise comparison of log-transformed PK parameters of ATV and LPV.

RESULTS

In period II, the ATV minimum concentration (Cmin) geometric mean (GM) was higher compared with period I (GM: 0.75 vs. 0.51 microg/mL, geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 1.45, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19 to 1.77; P = 0.006). The ATV area under the concentration-time curve from dosing to 24 hours after the dose (AUC0-24; GM: 36.40 vs. 39.62 microg.h/mL, GMR = 0.92, 90% CI: 0.80 to 1.05; P = 0.28) did not differ, however. The addition of 100 mg of RTV in period III did not significantly increase the ATV Cmin (GM: 0.84 vs. 0.75 microg/mL, GMR = 1.13, 90% CI: 0.91 to 1.40; P = 0.34) or ATV AUC0-24 (GM: 39.59 vs. 36.40 microg.h/mL, GMR = 1.09, 90% CI: 0.99 to 1.20; P = 0.14) compared with period II. The additional RTV in period III resulted in a higher LPV Cmin (GM: 5.12 vs. 3.99 microg/mL, GMR = 1.28, 90% CI: 1.15 to 1.43; P = 0.001), but the LPV areas under the concentration-time curve from dosing to 12 hours after the dose and maximum concentration were not significantly different. LPV PK parameters in period II were comparable to those of historical control subjects receiving LPV/r at a dose of 400/100 mg twice daily. All studied regimens were well tolerated. Indirect hyperbilirubinemia was the only grade 3 and 4 abnormality reported, which was expected given that ATV competitively inhibits UGTIA1 and has not been shown to result in other hepatic abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of ATV at a dose of 300 mg once daily plus LPV/r at a dose of 400/100 mg twice daily resulted in an appropriate PK profile for ATV and LPV and could be further evaluated in treatment-experienced patients requiring a dual-boosted protease inhibitor-containing regimen.

摘要

背景

洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)与阿扎那韦(ATV)联合核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂已被用作HIV感染患者的挽救治疗方案。由于这些药物在不同程度上是细胞色素P450 3A4的底物、诱导剂和抑制剂,因此人们担心这些联合药物的药代动力学(PK)会发生改变。

目的

确定不同剂量共同给药时ATV、利托那韦(RTV)和LPV之间的稳态PK相互作用。

方法

HIV阴性受试者(n = 15)按以下顺序接受ATV、RTV和LPV联合用药:第I阶段(第1 - 10天),ATV/r剂量为300/100 mg,每日1次;第II阶段(第11 - 24天),ATV剂量为300 mg,每日1次,加LPV/r剂量为400/100 mg,每日2次;第III阶段(第25 - 34天),ATV/r剂量为300/100 mg,每日1次,加LPV/r剂量为400/100 mg,每日2次。在第10、24和34天进行强化PK分析。采用配对t检验对ATV和LPV的对数转换PK参数进行两两比较。

结果

在第II阶段,与第I阶段相比,ATV最低浓度(Cmin)几何均值(GM)更高(GM:0.75 vs. 0.51 μg/mL,几何均值比(GMR) = 1.45,90%置信区间[CI]:1.19至1.77;P = 0.006)。然而,给药后至24小时的浓度 - 时间曲线下面积(AUC0 - 24;GM:36.40 vs. 39.62 μg·h/mL,GMR = 0.92,90% CI:0.80至1.05;P = 0.28)并无差异。第III阶段添加100 mg RTV后,与第II阶段相比,ATV Cmin(GM:0.84 vs. 0.75 μg/mL,GMR = 1.13,90% CI:0.91至1.40;P = 0.34)或ATV AUC0 - 24(GM:39.59 vs. 36.40 μg·h/mL,GMR = 1.09,90% CI:0.99至1.20;P = 0.14)无显著增加。第III阶段额外添加的RTV使LPV Cmin更高(GM:5.12 vs. 3.99 μg/mL,GMR = 1.28,90% CI:1.15至1.43;P = 0.001),但给药后至12小时的浓度 - 时间曲线下面积和LPV最高浓度并无显著差异。第II阶段LPV的PK参数与每日2次接受400/100 mg LPV/r的历史对照受试者相当。所有研究方案耐受性良好。间接高胆红素血症是唯一报告的3级和4级异常,鉴于ATV竞争性抑制UGTIA1且未显示会导致其他肝脏异常,这是预期的。

结论

每日1次300 mg ATV加每日2次400/100 mg LPV/r的联合用药方案使ATV和LPV具有合适的PK特征,对于需要含双重增强蛋白酶抑制剂方案的经治患者可进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Beneficial pharmacokinetic interaction between atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.阿扎那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦之间有益的药代动力学相互作用。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Jun 1;45(2):201-5. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318050d632.
2
Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir-lopinavir combination: a pharmacokinetic interaction study of total, unbound plasma and cellular exposures.利托那韦增强的阿扎那韦 - 洛匹那韦组合:一项关于总血浆、游离血浆及细胞暴露量的药代动力学相互作用研究。
Antivir Ther. 2006;11(1):53-62.
3
Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, atazanavir, and ritonavir in a twice-daily boosted double-protease inhibitor regimen.沙奎那韦、阿扎那韦和利托那韦在每日两次强化双蛋白酶抑制剂方案中的药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Apr;51(4):1431-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00854-06. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
4
Atazanavir plus ritonavir or saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir in patients experiencing multiple virological failures.对于经历多次病毒学失败的患者,使用阿扎那韦联合利托那韦或沙奎那韦,以及洛匹那韦/利托那韦。
AIDS. 2005 Apr 29;19(7):685-94. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000166091.39317.99.
5
Amprenavir and lopinavir pharmacokinetics following coadministration of amprenavir or fosamprenavir with lopinavir/ritonavir, with or without efavirenz.安普那韦或福沙普那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦合用时,无论是否联用依非韦伦,安普那韦和洛匹那韦的药代动力学情况。
Antivir Ther. 2007;12(6):963-9.
6
Economic and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) comparison of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and atazanavir plus ritonavir (ATV+RTV) based regimens for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and -experienced United Kingdom patients in 2011.2011 年英国初治和经治的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)患者中洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)和阿扎那韦/利托那韦(ATV+RTV)方案的经济学和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)比较。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):796-806. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.691927. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
7
96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures.多次病毒学失败患者中阿扎那韦/利托那韦每日一次与洛匹那韦/利托那韦每日两次的96周比较。
AIDS. 2006 Mar 21;20(5):711-8. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000216371.76689.63.
8
The relation between treatment outcome and efavirenz, atazanavir or lopinavir exposure in the NORTHIV trial of treatment-naïve HIV-1 infected patients.在 NORTHIV 试验中,初治 HIV-1 感染患者中依非韦伦、阿扎那韦或洛匹那韦的暴露与治疗结果的关系。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;66(4):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s00228-009-0763-z. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
9
Electrocardiogram abnormalities with atazanavir and lopinavir/ritonavir.阿扎那韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦导致的心电图异常
HIV Clin Trials. 2009 Sep-Oct;10(5):328-36. doi: 10.1310/hct1005-328.
10
Assessing the impact of substance use and hepatitis coinfection on atazanavir and lopinavir trough concentrations in HIV-infected patients during therapeutic drug monitoring.在治疗药物监测期间评估药物使用和肝炎合并感染对HIV感染患者阿扎那韦和洛匹那韦谷浓度的影响。
Ther Drug Monit. 2007 Oct;29(5):560-5. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31806db8ae.

引用本文的文献

1
Atazanavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection.阿扎那韦:关于其在HIV-1感染管理中应用的综述。
Drugs. 2009 May 29;69(8):1107-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969080-00009.
2
Double-boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral regimens: what role?双重强化蛋白酶抑制剂抗逆转录病毒疗法:作用如何?
Drugs. 2008;68(16):2257-67. doi: 10.2165/0003495-200868160-00001.
3
Decrease of atazanavir and lopinavir plasma concentrations in a boosted double human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor salvage regimen.在强化双重人类免疫缺陷病毒蛋白酶抑制剂挽救治疗方案中阿扎那韦和洛匹那韦血浆浓度的降低
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jun;52(6):2273-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01565-07. Epub 2008 Apr 14.