Movsas Benjamin, Moughan Jennifer, Owen Jean, Coia Lawrence R, Zelefsky Michael J, Hanks Gerald, Wilson J Frank
Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.051. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
To identify factors significantly influencing accrual to clinical protocols by analyzing radiation Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveys of 3,047 randomly selected radiotherapy (RT) patients.
Patterns of Care Study surveys from disease sites studied for the periods 1992-1994 and 1996-1999 (breast cancer, n = 1,080; prostate cancer, n = 1,149; esophageal cancer, n = 818) were analyzed. The PCS is a National Cancer Institute-funded national survey of randomly selected RT institutions in the United States. Patients with nonmetastatic disease who received RT as definitive or adjuvant therapy were randomly selected from eligible patients at each institution. To determine national estimates, individual patient records were weighted by the relative contribution of each institution and patients within each institution. Data regarding participation in clinical trials were recorded. The factors age, gender, race, type of insurance, and practice type of treating institution (academic or not) were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Overall, only 2.7% of all patients were accrued to clinical protocols. Of these, 57% were enrolled on institutional review board-approved institutional trials, and 43% on National Cancer Institute collaborative group studies. On multivariate analysis, patients treated at academic facilities (p = 0.0001) and white patients (vs. African Americans, p = 0.0002) were significantly more likely to participate in clinical oncology trials. Age, gender, type of cancer, and type of insurance were not predictive.
Practice type and race significantly influence enrollment onto clinical oncology trials. This suggests that increased communication and education regarding protocols, particularly focusing on physicians in nonacademic settings and minority patients, will be essential to enhance accrual.
通过分析对3047名随机选取的放射治疗(RT)患者进行的放射治疗模式护理研究(PCS)调查,确定显著影响临床方案入组率的因素。
分析了1992 - 1994年和1996 - 1999年研究的疾病部位的护理模式研究调查(乳腺癌,n = 1080;前列腺癌,n = 1149;食管癌,n = 818)。PCS是一项由美国国立癌症研究所资助的对美国随机选取的放疗机构进行的全国性调查。接受RT作为根治性或辅助性治疗的非转移性疾病患者从每个机构的合格患者中随机选取。为了确定全国估计值,个体患者记录按每个机构以及每个机构内患者的相对贡献进行加权。记录了参与临床试验的数据。通过单因素和多因素分析研究了年龄、性别、种族、保险类型和治疗机构的执业类型(是否为学术机构)等因素。
总体而言,所有患者中只有2.7%进入了临床方案。其中,57%参加了机构审查委员会批准的机构试验,43%参加了国立癌症研究所协作组研究。多因素分析显示,在学术机构接受治疗的患者(p = 0.0001)和白人患者(与非裔美国人相比,p = 0.0002)参与临床肿瘤试验的可能性显著更高。年龄、性别、癌症类型和保险类型没有预测性。
执业类型和种族显著影响临床肿瘤试验的入组情况。这表明加强关于方案的沟通和教育,特别是针对非学术环境中的医生和少数族裔患者,对于提高入组率至关重要。