Readers' and author's responses to "information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased".
作者信息
Smrcka Zdenek
出版信息
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):50; author reply 50.
PMID:17419107
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Readers' and author's responses to "information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):50; author reply 50.
2
Readers' and author's responses to "information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):50; author reply 50.
3
Readers' and author's responses to "information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):50; author reply 50.
4
Readers' and author's responses to "information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):50; author reply 50.
5
Readers' and author's responses to "information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):50; author reply 50.
6
Information on complementary and alternative medicine in US government databases is biased.
MedGenMed. 2006 Jun 9;8(2):70.
7
Publication bias in complementary/alternative medicine.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;60(11):1093-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
8
Readers' and author's responses to "ethics and anomalous (alternative) medical practices".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(3):69; author reply 69.
9
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
10
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
Zotero 插件