López-Ramón M V, Fontecha-Cámara M A, Alvarez-Merino M A, Moreno-Castilla C
Departamento de Química Inorgánica y Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Water Res. 2007 Jul;41(13):2865-70. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.059. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
This study investigated the removal of the herbicides diuron and amitrole from water under static and dynamic conditions using different activated carbons in the form of fibers, cloth, and grains. In all cases, there was much greater adsorption of diuron than of amitrole due to the lower solubility, greater hydrophobicity, and larger dipolar moment of the former. The activated carbon cloth was the best adsorbent for diuron under dynamic conditions because it had the largest mesopore volume, water-accessible pore volume, and surface area. However, the best adsorbent for amitrole under dynamic conditions was the granular activated carbon due to its higher surface basicity. Comparisons using the best adsorbent for each herbicide showed that diuron was removed by the activated carbon more efficiently compared with amitrole under both dynamic and static conditions.
本研究调查了使用纤维、布和颗粒等不同形式的活性炭,在静态和动态条件下去除水中除草剂敌草隆和杀草强的情况。在所有情况下,由于敌草隆的溶解度较低、疏水性更强且偶极矩更大,其吸附量远大于杀草强。在动态条件下,活性炭布是吸附敌草隆的最佳吸附剂,因为它具有最大的中孔体积、可通水孔体积和表面积。然而,在动态条件下,颗粒活性炭是吸附杀草强的最佳吸附剂,因为其表面碱性更高。使用每种除草剂的最佳吸附剂进行比较表明,在动态和静态条件下,活性炭去除敌草隆的效率均高于杀草强。