Bhogal N, Combes R
Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments, 96-98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham, NG1 4EE, UK.
Toxicol In Vitro. 2007 Oct;21(7):1227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
The recently failed first-in-man clinical trial of TGN1412 raises concerns about whether the existing drug testing paradigm is suited to the safety assessment of drugs based on immunostimulatory antibodies that have complex and novel mechanisms of action. In particular, there is a need to consider whether animal studies are relevant and, if so, how the resulting information can be used to best inform clinical studies. The preclinical testing of TGN1412 is considered in relation to the selection of a suitable test species, deficiencies in an understanding of the similarities and differences between human and other primate immune functioning and species extrapolation. It is concluded that more emphasis should be placed on the development and use of in vitro and computational methods to identify potentially important species differences in the activity of immunostimulatory antibodies. Such approaches are useful with regards to species extrapolation, mechanistic studies and the design of both preclinical tests in animals and clinical studies in humans.
近期,TGN1412首次人体临床试验失败,这引发了人们对于现有药物测试模式是否适用于基于具有复杂且新颖作用机制的免疫刺激抗体的药物安全性评估的担忧。特别是,有必要考虑动物研究是否具有相关性,如果相关,如何利用由此获得的信息来为临床研究提供最佳参考。本文结合合适测试物种的选择、对人类和其他灵长类动物免疫功能异同理解的不足以及物种外推,对TGN1412的临床前测试进行了探讨。得出的结论是,应更加重视开发和使用体外及计算方法,以识别免疫刺激抗体活性中潜在的重要物种差异。这些方法在物种外推、机制研究以及动物临床前测试和人体临床研究设计方面均有用处。