Haferkamp Axel, Bastian Patrick J, Jakobi Hildegard, Pritsch Maria, Pfitzenmaier Jesco, Albers Peter, Hallscheidt Peter, Müller Stefan C, Hohenfellner Markus
Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.039.
We prospectively evaluated long-term survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma extending to the inferior vena cava.
From 1993 and thereafter we followed 86 men and 48 women with a median age of 64 years (range 28 to 86) with renal cell carcinoma and tumor thrombus involvement of the inferior vena cava. Cancer specific survival was analyzed based on clinical therapy, tumor extent, thrombus level and grading.
Median followup was 16.4 months (range 0 to 178.9). At the time of this report 97 cancer specific deaths had occurred. Of the 134 patients 111 underwent radical nephrectomy, cavotomy and thrombus extraction, of whom 30 had distant metastases at surgery, and 23 were treated with embolization and immunotherapy. These nonsurgical patients who refused surgery had a high tumor load or a low Karnofsky performance status that may have affected survival. They died at a median of 6.9 months (range 0.1 to 23.6). Patients treated surgically, including those with metastases, had a significantly higher median survival of 19.8 months (range 0 to 178.9). Surgical patients with localized tumor (N0M0) had significantly higher median survival than those with metastatic (NxM1) disease (51.7 months, range 0 to 178.9 vs 6.9, range 0.6 to 149.7). Surgical patients with metastatic disease who underwent interferon and interleukin based immunotherapy had significantly higher median survival than those who did not (13.5 months, range 2.5 to 149.7 vs 5.1, range 0.6 to 24.0). On multivariate analysis localized tumor stage (N0M0) vs advanced tumor stage (N+M0 and NxM1), Fuhrman grade groups 1 and 2 vs 3 and 4, and tumor thrombus levels I and II vs III and IV were independent prognostic factors.
Currently radical surgery represents the only chance of long-term survival for patients with renal cell carcinoma and tumor thrombus extension in the inferior vena cava. Median cancer specific survival is significantly higher with localized tumor. However, even with metastatic disease radical surgery can prolong survival, especially when immunotherapy is added. Fuhrman grade and tumor thrombus level are also prognostic factors.
我们前瞻性评估了肾细胞癌侵犯下腔静脉患者的长期生存情况。
自1993年起,我们对86例男性和48例女性肾细胞癌伴下腔静脉瘤栓患者进行了随访,患者中位年龄64岁(范围28至86岁)。基于临床治疗、肿瘤范围、瘤栓水平和分级分析癌症特异性生存情况。
中位随访时间为16.4个月(范围0至178.9个月)。在本报告发布时,已发生97例癌症特异性死亡。134例患者中,111例接受了根治性肾切除术、腔静脉切开术和瘤栓切除术,其中30例在手术时有远处转移,23例接受了栓塞和免疫治疗。这些拒绝手术的非手术患者肿瘤负荷高或卡诺夫斯基功能状态低,这可能影响了生存。他们的中位死亡时间为6.9个月(范围0.1至23.6个月)。接受手术治疗的患者,包括有转移的患者,中位生存期显著更长,为19.8个月(范围0至178.9个月)。局限性肿瘤(N0M0)的手术患者中位生存期显著高于转移性(NxM1)疾病患者(51.7个月,范围0至178.9个月 vs 6.9个月,范围0.6至149.7个月)。接受基于干扰素和白细胞介素的免疫治疗的转移性疾病手术患者中位生存期显著高于未接受免疫治疗的患者(13.5个月,范围2.5至149.7个月 vs 5.1个月,范围0.6至24.0个月)。多因素分析显示,局限性肿瘤分期(N0M0)与晚期肿瘤分期(N+M0和NxM1)、福尔曼分级1级和2级与3级和4级、以及瘤栓水平I级和II级与III级和IV级是独立的预后因素。
目前,根治性手术是肾细胞癌伴下腔静脉瘤栓延伸患者长期生存的唯一机会。局限性肿瘤患者的癌症特异性中位生存期显著更高。然而,即使是转移性疾病,根治性手术也可以延长生存期,尤其是在加用免疫治疗时。福尔曼分级和瘤栓水平也是预后因素。