Suppr超能文献

在恒河猴中,与吗啡联合研究时,纳曲酮的表观pA2值随时间下降。

Time-dependent decreases in apparent pA2 values for naltrexone studied in combination with morphine in rhesus monkeys.

作者信息

Gerak Lisa R, France Charles P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Aug;193(3):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0787-y. Epub 2007 Apr 20.

Abstract

RATIONALE

One assumption of Schild analyses, which have been used extensively to characterize opioids in vitro and in vivo, is that the concentration of antagonist is at equilibrium; violation of this assumption would yield slopes of Schild plots that deviate from unity. For in vivo studies, the concentration of antagonist changes as it is eliminated; however, if studies are conducted at a time when the antagonist is maximally effective, the assumption of equilibrium is not violated.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of these studies was to determine how increasing the delay between antagonist administration and determination of dose-effect curves alters results of Schild analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monkeys received 3.2 mg/kg/day of morphine and discriminated naltrexone while responding under a fixed-ratio 5 schedule of stimulus-shock termination. In monkeys acutely deprived of morphine (27 h), naltrexone was administered 1, 2, 4, or 6 h before determination of morphine dose-effect curves.

RESULTS

Morphine-deprived monkeys responded on the naltrexone-appropriate lever, and this effect was reversed by morphine. Naltrexone dose- and time-dependently antagonized morphine. Schild analyses yielded slopes that did not deviate from unity; however, as the delay between naltrexone administration and determination of morphine dose-effect curves increased, apparent pA(2) values decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The assumption of equilibrium of antagonist at receptor sites does not appear to be violated, regardless of when it is administered, and changes in naltrexone concentration as it is eliminated are reflected in orderly decreases in potency. These results further indicate the strength of Schild analyses for describing interactions between drugs and receptors in vivo.

摘要

理论依据

希尔德分析(已广泛用于在体外和体内表征阿片类药物)的一个假设是拮抗剂浓度处于平衡状态;违反此假设会导致希尔德图的斜率偏离1。对于体内研究,拮抗剂浓度在其消除过程中会发生变化;然而,如果在拮抗剂最大有效时进行研究,则不会违反平衡假设。

目的

这些研究的目的是确定增加拮抗剂给药与剂量效应曲线测定之间的延迟如何改变希尔德分析的结果。

材料与方法

猴子接受3.2mg/kg/天的吗啡,并在固定比率5的刺激-电击终止程序下进行反应时辨别纳曲酮。在急性吗啡剥夺(27小时)的猴子中,在测定吗啡剂量效应曲线前1、2、4或6小时给予纳曲酮。

结果

吗啡剥夺的猴子在与纳曲酮相应的杠杆上做出反应,这种效应被吗啡逆转。纳曲酮剂量和时间依赖性地拮抗吗啡。希尔德分析得出的斜率未偏离1;然而,随着纳曲酮给药与吗啡剂量效应曲线测定之间的延迟增加,表观pA(2)值降低。

结论

无论何时给药,受体部位拮抗剂的平衡假设似乎都未被违反,并且随着纳曲酮的消除其浓度变化反映在效能的有序降低中。这些结果进一步表明了希尔德分析在描述体内药物与受体相互作用方面的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验