Yazdi P M, Schou S, Jensen S S, Stoltze K, Kenrad B, Sewerin I
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int Endod J. 2007 Jul;40(7):493-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01242.x. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
To evaluate treatment outcome after using a resin composite (Retroplast, RP) in combination with a dentine-bonding agent (GLUMA) as root-end filling material after 1 year as well as after more than 5 years (final examination). Also, the influence of various pre-, intra- and postoperative factors on the treatment outcome was studied.
All patients (87) undergoing root-end resection consecutively treated by root-end filling with RP on an incisor, canine, pre-molar, or first molar (87 teeth, 118 roots) were initially enrolled in the study. RP was applied on the entire resected surface that was prepared to a slightly concave shape and after conditioning with EDTA and GLUMA. The treatment outcome involving subjective, clinical and radiographic parameters was evaluated after 1 year and at the final examination. A total of 27 patients (36 roots) were excluded from the study because of unavailability of follow-up (19) and extraction of the operated tooth for reasons other than failed surgery (8). Consequently, 60 patients (82 roots) were included in the final material. The mean follow-up period at the final examination was 8 years (range: 6.5-9 years).
The radiographic evaluation at the final examination revealed that 77%, 5%, 7% and 11% of the treated roots were characterized by complete, incomplete, uncertain and unsatisfactory healing, respectively. A total of 95% of the roots classified as completely healed at the 1-year control were also completely healed at the final examination. Two roots (5%) showing complete healing at the 1-year control revealed unsatisfactory healing at the final examination because of displaced or lost RP-filling. Moreover, 60% of the roots with uncertain healing at the 1-year control demonstrated complete or incomplete healing at the final examination. The classification according to subjective, clinical and radiographic parameters revealed that 78% of the teeth were characterized by a successful treatment outcome at the final examination. Evaluation of the influence of various pre-, intra- and postoperative factors on the treatment outcome revealed that the radiographic classification at the final examination was exclusively influenced by the radiographic classification at the 1-year control (P < 0.001).
The present long-term study indicates that RP can be used for root-end filling with a successful treatment outcome.
评估使用树脂复合材料(Retroplast,RP)联合牙本质粘结剂(GLUMA)作为根充材料1年后以及5年多(最终检查)后的治疗效果。此外,还研究了各种术前、术中和术后因素对治疗效果的影响。
所有连续接受根端切除术并使用RP对切牙、尖牙、前磨牙或第一磨牙进行根充的患者(87例)最初纳入本研究(87颗牙,118个牙根)。RP应用于整个切除表面,该表面制备成略凹的形状,并经EDTA和GLUMA预处理。在1年后和最终检查时评估涉及主观、临床和影像学参数的治疗效果。共有27例患者(36个牙根)因无法随访(19例)以及因手术失败以外的原因拔除患牙(8例)而被排除在研究之外。因此,最终材料纳入60例患者(82个牙根)。最终检查时的平均随访期为8年(范围:6.5 - 9年)。
最终检查时的影像学评估显示,分别有77%、5%、7%和11%的治疗牙根表现为完全愈合、不完全愈合、愈合情况不确定和愈合不满意。在1年对照时分类为完全愈合的牙根中,共有95%在最终检查时也完全愈合。2个牙根(5%)在1年对照时显示完全愈合,但在最终检查时因RP充填物移位或丢失而愈合不满意。此外,在1年对照时愈合情况不确定的牙根中,60%在最终检查时显示完全或不完全愈合。根据主观、临床和影像学参数进行的分类显示,78%的牙齿在最终检查时治疗效果成功。对各种术前、术中和术后因素对治疗效果影响的评估显示,最终检查时的影像学分类仅受1年对照时影像学分类的影响(P < 0.001)。
本长期研究表明,RP可用于根端充填,治疗效果良好。