Sherer Kevin, Li Yan, Cui Xizhong, Li Xuemei, Subramanian Mani, Laird Michael W, Moayeri Mahtab, Leppla Stephen H, Fitz Yvonne, Su Junwu, Eichacker Peter Q
Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1560-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266535.95770.A2.
The aim of this study was to test the effects of normal saline treatment either alone or in combination with protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody in a lethal toxin-infused rat model of anthrax sepsis.
Prospective controlled animal study.
Animal research laboratory.
Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 539).
We initially tested the efficacy of three normal saline doses (5, 10, or 20 mL/kg/hr intravenously for 24 hrs) or none (controls) started when rats were treated with either lethal toxin (24-hr infusion) or, for comparison, lipopolysaccharide (24-hr infusion) or Escherichia coli (intravenous bolus). We then investigated delaying normal saline for 6 hrs or combining it with protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody following lethal toxin challenge.
Dose did not alter the effects of normal saline with any challenge (p not significant for all) or when combined with protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody, so this variable was averaged in analysis. In initial studies, normal saline decreased mortality (mean hazards ratio of survival +/- SE) significantly with E. coli challenge (-0.66 +/- 0.25, p = .009 averaged over normal saline dose) but not lipopolysaccharide (-0.17 +/- 0.20). In contrast, normal saline increased mortality significantly with lethal toxin (0.69 +/- 0.20, p = .001) in a pattern different from E. coli and lipopolysaccharide (p <or= .002 for each). In subsequent studies, normal saline alone once again increased mortality (0.8 +/- 0.3, p = .006), protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody alone reduced it (-1.7 +/- 0.8, p = .03), and the combination had intermediate effects that were not significant (0.04 +/- 0.3).
These findings raise the possibility that normal saline treatment may actually worsen outcome with anthrax lethal toxin. Furthermore, lethal toxin-directed therapies may not be as beneficial when used in combination with this type of fluid support.
本研究旨在测试在注入致死毒素的炭疽败血症大鼠模型中,单独使用生理盐水治疗或联合使用针对保护性抗原的单克隆抗体的效果。
前瞻性对照动物研究。
动物研究实验室。
斯普拉格-道利大鼠(n = 539)。
我们最初测试了三种生理盐水剂量(静脉注射5、10或20 mL/kg/小时,持续24小时)或不进行治疗(对照组)的效果,治疗在大鼠接受致死毒素(24小时输注)、或作为对照的脂多糖(24小时输注)或大肠杆菌(静脉推注)治疗时开始。然后,我们研究了在致死毒素攻击后延迟6小时给予生理盐水或使其与针对保护性抗原的单克隆抗体联合使用的效果。
剂量并未改变生理盐水在任何攻击情况下的效果(所有p值均无统计学意义),也未改变其与针对保护性抗原的单克隆抗体联合使用时的效果,因此在分析中将该变量进行了平均处理。在最初的研究中,生理盐水在大肠杆菌攻击时显著降低了死亡率(生存的平均风险比±标准误)(-0.66±0.25,生理盐水剂量平均后p = 0.009),但在脂多糖攻击时未降低死亡率(-0.17±0.20)。相比之下,生理盐水在致死毒素攻击时显著增加了死亡率(0.69±0.20,p = 0.001),其模式与大肠杆菌和脂多糖不同(每种情况p≤0.002)。在随后的研究中,单独使用生理盐水再次增加了死亡率(0.8±0.3,p =